GRADE equity guidelines 3: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: rating the certainty of synthesized evidence
- PMID: 28389397
- PMCID: PMC5680526
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.01.015
GRADE equity guidelines 3: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: rating the certainty of synthesized evidence
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this paper is to describe a conceptual framework for how to consider health equity in the Grading Recommendations Assessment and Development Evidence (GRADE) guideline development process.
Study design and setting: Consensus-based guidance developed by the GRADE working group members and other methodologists.
Results: We developed consensus-based guidance to help address health equity when rating the certainty of synthesized evidence (i.e., quality of evidence). When health inequity is determined to be a concern by stakeholders, we propose five methods for explicitly assessing health equity: (1) include health equity as an outcome; (2) consider patient-important outcomes relevant to health equity; (3) assess differences in the relative effect size of the treatment; (4) assess differences in baseline risk and the differing impacts on absolute effects; and (5) assess indirectness of evidence to disadvantaged populations and/or settings.
Conclusion: The most important priority for research on health inequity and guidelines is to identify and document examples where health equity has been considered explicitly in guidelines. Although there is a weak scientific evidence base for assessing health equity, this should not discourage the explicit consideration of how guidelines and recommendations affect the most vulnerable members of society.
Keywords: Applicability; GRADE; Guidelines; Health; Indirectness; Meta-analysis; Subgroup analysis; Systematic review; equity.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
References
-
- Whitehead M. The concepts and principles of equity and health. Int J Health Serv. 1992;22:429–445. - PubMed
-
- O'Neill J., Tabish H., Welch V., Petticrew M., Pottie K., Clarke M. Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:56–64. - PubMed
-
- Welch V., Akl E.A., Guyatt G., Pottie K., Eslava-Schmalbache J., Ansarif M.T. GRADE Equity: introduction: why health equity and GRADE guidelines? J Clin Epidemiol. 2016
-
- National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence . 2nd ed. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; London, UK: 2012. Positively equal: a guide to addressing equality issues in developing NICE clinical guidelines. Available at http://www.nice.org.uk. Accessed June 1, 2017.
-
- Mitchell J., Trangle M., Degnan B., Gabert T., Haight B., Kessler D. Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI); 2013. Depression, adult in primary care. Available at https://www.icsi.org/guidelines__more/catalog_guidelines_and_more/catalo.... Accessed June 1, 2017.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
