Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Oct:90:76-83.
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.01.015. Epub 2017 Apr 4.

GRADE equity guidelines 3: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: rating the certainty of synthesized evidence

Affiliations

GRADE equity guidelines 3: considering health equity in GRADE guideline development: rating the certainty of synthesized evidence

Vivian A Welch et al. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Oct.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this paper is to describe a conceptual framework for how to consider health equity in the Grading Recommendations Assessment and Development Evidence (GRADE) guideline development process.

Study design and setting: Consensus-based guidance developed by the GRADE working group members and other methodologists.

Results: We developed consensus-based guidance to help address health equity when rating the certainty of synthesized evidence (i.e., quality of evidence). When health inequity is determined to be a concern by stakeholders, we propose five methods for explicitly assessing health equity: (1) include health equity as an outcome; (2) consider patient-important outcomes relevant to health equity; (3) assess differences in the relative effect size of the treatment; (4) assess differences in baseline risk and the differing impacts on absolute effects; and (5) assess indirectness of evidence to disadvantaged populations and/or settings.

Conclusion: The most important priority for research on health inequity and guidelines is to identify and document examples where health equity has been considered explicitly in guidelines. Although there is a weak scientific evidence base for assessing health equity, this should not discourage the explicit consideration of how guidelines and recommendations affect the most vulnerable members of society.

Keywords: Applicability; GRADE; Guidelines; Health; Indirectness; Meta-analysis; Subgroup analysis; Systematic review; equity.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Whitehead M. The concepts and principles of equity and health. Int J Health Serv. 1992;22:429–445. - PubMed
    1. O'Neill J., Tabish H., Welch V., Petticrew M., Pottie K., Clarke M. Applying an equity lens to interventions: using PROGRESS ensures consideration of socially stratifying factors to illuminate inequities in health. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:56–64. - PubMed
    1. Welch V., Akl E.A., Guyatt G., Pottie K., Eslava-Schmalbache J., Ansarif M.T. GRADE Equity: introduction: why health equity and GRADE guidelines? J Clin Epidemiol. 2016
    1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence . 2nd ed. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; London, UK: 2012. Positively equal: a guide to addressing equality issues in developing NICE clinical guidelines. Available at http://www.nice.org.uk. Accessed June 1, 2017.
    1. Mitchell J., Trangle M., Degnan B., Gabert T., Haight B., Kessler D. Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement (ICSI); 2013. Depression, adult in primary care. Available at https://www.icsi.org/guidelines__more/catalog_guidelines_and_more/catalo.... Accessed June 1, 2017.