Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2017 May;27(5):418-422.
doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Feb 16.

The impact of using sagittal abdominal diameter to predict major cardiovascular events in European patients with type 2 diabetes

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The impact of using sagittal abdominal diameter to predict major cardiovascular events in European patients with type 2 diabetes

K Rådholm et al. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 May.

Abstract

Background and aims: Obesity is associated with diabetes type 2 and one of the most important risk factors for cardiovascular disease. We explored if sagittal abdominal diameter (SAD) is a better predictor of major cardiovascular events than waist circumference (WC) and body mass index (BMI) in type 2 diabetes.

Methods and results: The CARDIPP study consists of a cohort of patients with type 2 diabetes. In this study we used data from 635 participants with no previous myocardial infarction or stroke, with a mean follow-up time of 7.1 years. SAD, WC and BMI were measured at baseline and the end-point was first cardiovascular event, measured as a composite of ICD-10 codes for acute myocardial infarction, stroke or cardiovascular mortality. SAD was significantly higher in the major cardiovascular event group compared to participants that did not suffer a major cardiovascular event during follow-up (p < 0.001). SAD >25 cm was the only anthropometric measurement that remained associated with major cardiovascular events when adjusted for modifiable and non-modifiable factors (hazard ratio 2.81, 95% confidence interval 1.37-5.76, p = 0.005).

Conclusion: SAD with the cut off level of >25 cm, if confirmed in larger studies, may be used as a more independent risk-assessment tool compared with WC in clinical practice, to identify persons with type 2 diabetes at high cardiovascular risk. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01049737.

Keywords: Anthropometric measurements; Cardiovascular risk; Diabetes; Obesity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources