Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan 1;32(suppl_1):i106-i114.
doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw309.

Provider perspectives on treatment decision-making in nephrotic syndrome

Michelle A Hladunewich  1 , Heather Beanlands  2 , Emily Herreshoff  3 , Jonathan P Troost  3 , Maria Maione  2 , Howard Trachtman  4 , Caroline Poulton  5 , Patrick Nachman  5 , Mary Margaret Modes  6 , Marilyn Hailperin  7 , Renee Pitter  3 , Debbie S Gipson  3
Affiliations

Provider perspectives on treatment decision-making in nephrotic syndrome

Michelle A Hladunewich et al. Nephrol Dial Transplant. .

Abstract

Background: Managing patients with nephrotic syndrome (NS) remains difficult for the practicing nephrologist. This often young patient population is faced with a debilitating, relapsing and remitting disease with non-specific treatment options that are often poorly tolerated. Clinicians managing these complex patients must attempt to apply disease-specific evidence while considering the individual patient's clinical and personal situation.

Methods: We conducted qualitative interviews to ascertain the provider perspectives of NS, treatment options and factors that influence recommendations for disease management, and administered a survey to assess both facilitators and barriers to the implementation of the Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) guidelines.

Results: When making treatment recommendations, providers considered characteristics of various treatments such as efficacy, side effects and evaluation of risk versus benefit, taking into account how the specific treatment fit with the individual patient. Time constraints and the complexity of explaining the intricacies of NS were noted as significant barriers to care. Although the availability of guidelines was deemed a facilitator to care, the value of the KDIGO guidelines was limited by the perception of poor quality of evidence.

Conclusions: The complexity of NS and the scarcity of robust evidence to support treatment recommendations are common challenges reported by nephrologists. Future development and use of shared learning platforms may support the integration of best available evidence, patient/family preferences and exchange of information at a pace that is unconstrained by the outpatient clinic schedule.

Keywords: KDIGO guidelines; learning needs; nephrotic syndrome; qualitative approaches; treatment decision-making.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Kitson A, Marshall A, Bassett K, et al. What are the core elements of patient-centred care? A narrative review and synthesis of the literature from health policy, medicine and nursing. J Adv Nurs 2013; 69: 4–15 - PubMed
    1. Fredericks S, Lapum J, Schwind J, et al. Discussion of patient-centered care in health care organizations. Qual Manag Health Care 2012; 21: 127–134 - PubMed
    1. Irwin RS, Richardson ND. Patient-focused care: using the right tools. Chest 2006; 130(1 Suppl): 73s–82s - PubMed
    1. KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int Suppl. Volume 2, Issue 2, 2012
    1. Teddlie C, Tashakkori A. Major issues and controversies in the used of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In: Tashakkori A, Teddlie C (eds)Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2003