Fetal foot length at delivery as a tool for determining gestation length in non-macerated stillbirths
- PMID: 28391625
- PMCID: PMC5478925
- DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12177
Fetal foot length at delivery as a tool for determining gestation length in non-macerated stillbirths
Abstract
Objective: To assess whether fetal foot length at autopsy could reliably indicate gestation duration at stillbirth and the effects of maceration on this method.
Methods: The present cross-sectional secondary analysis was part of the Safe Passage Study; all Safe Passage Study participants who experienced a stillbirth at Tygerberg Academic Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa, between August 1, 2007, and January 31, 2015, were eligible to participate. After providing written informed consent for autopsy, the duration of gestation calculated using early ultrasonography and fetal foot length were compared.
Results: There were 69 fetal autopsies included in the present study; placental histology was available for 65. Generally, the gestation length calculated from the first ultrasonography scan correlated well with that calculated from the fetal foot length (Spearman correlation=0.85). However, significant differences were found in the gestation lengths calculated when the fetus was macerated (P<0.001), or when umbilical cord pathology (P<0.001) or maternal vascular malperfusion (P<0.001) was the cause of fetal death.
Conclusion: Foot length at stillbirth was a good indicator of gestation length; however, it was a weaker indicator if fetal maceration had occurred.
Keywords: Fetal growth; Foot length; Gestational age; Macerated stillbirth; Maternal vascular malperfusion; Umbilical cord pathology.
© 2017 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Waiswa P, Amouzou A, Mathers C, Hogan D, et al. Stillbirths: rates, risk factors, and acceleration towards 2030. www.thelancet.com Published online January 18, 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00837-5. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Blencowe H, Cousens S, Jassir FB, Say L, Chou D, Mathers C, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of stillbirth rates in 2015, with trends from 2000: A systematic analysis. Lancet Global Health. 2016;4:e98–e108. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
