Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Mar;50(2):117-125.
doi: 10.5946/ce.2017.045. Epub 2017 Mar 30.

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Management of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: Update and Review of the Literature

Affiliations
Review

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Management of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: Update and Review of the Literature

Ali Alali et al. Clin Endosc. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Severe acute pancreatitis is often complicated by the development of pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs), which may be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. It is crucial to accurately classify these collections as a pseudocyst or walled-off necrosis (WON) given significant differences in outcomes and management. Interventions for PFCs have increasingly shifted to less invasive strategies, with endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided methods being shown to be safer and equally effective as more invasive surgical techniques. In recent years, many new developments have improved the safety and efficacy of EUS-guided interventions, such as the introduction of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS), direct endoscopic necrosectomy (DEN) and multiple other adjunctive techniques. Despite these developments, treatment of PFCs, and infected WON in particular, continues to be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In this article, we discuss the EUS-guided management of PFCs while reviewing the latest developments and controversies in the field. We end by summarizing our own approach to managing PFCs.

Keywords: Endosonography; Pancreatic fluid collection; Pseudocyst; Walled-off necrosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Computed tomography (CT) scan of a patient with a pseudocyst. The pseudocyst is surrounded by a mature wall and is free of any solid debris.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Computed tomography (CT) scan of a patient with walled-off necrosis (WON). Note the heterogeneous appearance of the collection that contains solid, necrotic debris.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.
Patient with symptomatic walled-off necrosis (WON) with trans-gastric lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) inserted under endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guidance.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 4.
Endoscopic view within a walled-off necrosis (WON) cavity accessed with a therapeutic gastroscope through a lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS). Note the necrotic debris.

References

    1. Gomatos IP, Halloran CM, Ghaneh P, et al. Outcomes from minimal access retroperitoneal and open pancreatic necrosectomy in 394 patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. Ann Surg. 2016;263:992–1001. - PubMed
    1. Varadarajulu S, Bang JY, Sutton BS, Trevino JM, Christein JD, Wilcox CM. Equal efficacy of endoscopic and surgical cystogastrostomy for pancreatic pseudocyst drainage in a randomized trial. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:583–590.e1. - PubMed
    1. Varadarajulu S, Christein JD, Tamhane A, Drelichman ER, Wilcox CM. Prospective randomized trial comparing EUS and EGD for transmural drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts (with videos) Gastrointest Endosc. 2008;68:1102–1111. - PubMed
    1. Park DH, Lee SS, Moon SH, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided versus conventional transmural drainage for pancreatic pseudocysts: a prospective randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2009;41:842–848. - PubMed
    1. Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, et al. Classification of acute pancreatitis--2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013;62:102–111. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources