Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Mar 24:11:947-954.
doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S108872. eCollection 2017.

Differential clinical pharmacology of rolapitant in delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)

Affiliations
Review

Differential clinical pharmacology of rolapitant in delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV)

Noha Rashad et al. Drug Des Devel Ther. .

Abstract

Rolapitant is a highly selective neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist, orally administered for a single dose of 180 mg before chemotherapy with granisetron D1, dexamethasone 8 mg BID on day 2-4. It has a unique pharmacological characteristic of a long plasma half-life (between 163 and 183 hours); this long half-life makes a single use sufficient to cover the delayed emesis risk period. No major drug-drug interactions between rolapitant and dexamethasone or other cytochrome P450 inducers or inhibitors were observed. The clinical efficacy of rolapitant was studied in two phase III trials in highly emetogenic chemotherapy and in one clinical trial in moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving a complete response (defined as no emesis or use of rescue medication) in the delayed phase (>24-120 hours after chemotherapy). In comparison to granisetron (10 μg/kg intravenously) and dexamethasone (20 mg orally) on day 1, and dexamethasone (8 mg orally) twice daily on days 2-4 and placebo, rolapitant showed superior efficacy in the control of delayed and overall emesis. This review aims at revising the pharmacological characteristics of rolapitant, offering an updated review of the available clinical efficacy and safety data of rolapitant in different clinical settings, highlighting the place of rolapitant in the management of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) among currently available guidelines, and exploring the future directions of CINV management.

Keywords: CINV; chemotherapy; nausea; rolapitant; vomiting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure This paper does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors. The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Coates A, Abraham S, Kaye SB, et al. On the receiving end – patient perception of the side-effects of cancer chemotherapy. [Accessed December 18, 2016];Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1983 19(2):203–208. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6681766. - PubMed
    1. Russo S, Cinausero M, Gerratana L, et al. Factors affecting patient’s perception of anticancer treatments side-effects: an observational study. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2014;13(2):139–150. - PubMed
    1. Patient perceptions about potential side effects and benefits from chemotherapy agents; Presented at: 2013 ASCO Annual Meeting; 2013. [Accessed December 18, 2016]. Available from: http://meetinglibrary.asco.org/content/113167-132.
    1. Aapro M, Molassiotis A, Dicato M, et al. The effect of guideline- consistent antiemetic therapy on chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV): the Pan European Emesis Registry (PEER) Ann Oncol. 2012;23(8):1986–1992. - PubMed
    1. Inoue M, Shoji M, Shindo N, Otsuka K, Miura M, Shibata H. Cohort study of consistency between the compliance with guidelines for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and patient outcome. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2015;16(1):5. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms