Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar;36(2):92-98.
doi: 10.1007/s12664-017-0743-7. Epub 2017 Apr 10.

Quality of life of liver donors following donor hepatectomy

Affiliations

Quality of life of liver donors following donor hepatectomy

Biju Chandran et al. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2017 Mar.

Abstract

Background: Although morbidity following living liver donation is well characterized, there is sparse data regarding health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of donors.

Methods: HRQOL of 200 consecutive live liver donors from 2011-2014 performed at an Indian center were prospectively collected using the SF-36 version 2, 1 year after surgery. The effect of donor demographics, operative details, post-operative complications (Clavien-Dindo and 50-50 criteria), and recipient mortality on the quality-of-life (QOL) scoring was analyzed.

Results: Among 200 donors (female/male=141:59), 77 (38.5%) had complications (14.5%, 16.5%, 4.5%, and 3.5%, Clavien-Dindo grades I-IV, respectively). The physical composite score (PCS) of donors 1 year after surgery was less than ideal (48.75±9.5) while the mental composite score (MCS) was good (53.37±6.16). Recipient death was the only factor that showed a statistically significant correlation with both PCS (p<0.001) and MCS (p=0.05). Age above 50 years (p<0.001), increasing body mass index (BMI) (p=0.026), and hospital stay more than 14 days ( p= 0.042) negatively affected the physical scores while emergency surgery (p<0.001) resulted in lower mental scores. Gender, postoperative complications, type of graft, or fulfillment of 50-50 criteria did not influence HRQOL. On asking the hypothetical question whether the donors would be willing to donate again, 99% reiterated there will be no change in their decision.

Conclusion: Recipient death, donation in emergency setting, age above 50, higher BMI, and prolonged hospital stay are factors that lead to impaired HRQOL following live liver donation. Despite this, 99% donors did not repent the decision to donate.

Keywords: Liver donor; Living donor liver transplantation; Quality of life; SF-36.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Qual Life Res. 2001;10(5):405-13; discussion 415-20 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2003 Feb 27;348(9):818-25 - PubMed
    1. Liver Transpl. 2012 Nov;18(11):1343-52 - PubMed
    1. Transpl Int. 2000;13(5):333-9 - PubMed
    1. Liver Transpl. 2007 Jun;13(6):886-95 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources