Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2017 Dec;58(12):1330-1340.
doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12728. Epub 2017 Apr 10.

Randomised trial of a parent-mediated intervention for infants at high risk for autism: longitudinal outcomes to age 3 years

Collaborators, Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Randomised trial of a parent-mediated intervention for infants at high risk for autism: longitudinal outcomes to age 3 years

Jonathan Green et al. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

Background: There has been increasing interest in the potential for pre-emptive interventions in the prodrome of autism, but little investigation as to their effect.

Methods: A two-site, two-arm assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial (RCT) of a 12-session parent-mediated social communication intervention delivered between 9 and 14 months of age (Intervention in the British Autism Study of Infant Siblings-Video Interaction for Promoting Positive Parenting), against no intervention. Fifty-four infants (28 intervention, 26 nonintervention) at familial risk of autism but not otherwise selected for developmental atypicality were assessed at 9-month baseline, 15-month treatment endpoint, and 27- and 39-month follow-up.

Primary outcome: severity of autism prodromal symptoms, blind-rated on Autism Observation Schedule for Infants or Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule 2nd Edition across the four assessment points.

Secondary outcomes: blind-rated parent-child interaction and child language; nonblind parent-rated communication and socialisation. Prespecified intention-to-treat analysis combined estimates from repeated measures within correlated regressions to estimate the overall effect of the infancy intervention over time.

Results: Effect estimates in favour of intervention on autism prodromal symptoms, maximal at 27 months, had confidence intervals (CIs) at each separate time point including the null, but showed a significant overall effect over the course of the intervention and follow-up period (effect size [ES] = 0.32; 95% CI 0.04, 0.60; p = .026). Effects on proximal intervention targets of parent nondirectiveness/synchrony (ES = 0.33; CI 0.04, 0.63; p = .013) and child attentiveness/communication initiation (ES = 0.36; 95% CI 0.04, 0.68; p = .015) showed similar results. There was no effect on categorical diagnostic outcome or formal language measures.

Conclusions: Follow-up to 3 years of the first RCT of a very early social communication intervention for infants at familial risk of developing autism has shown a treatment effect, extending 24 months after intervention end, to reduce the overall severity of autism prodromal symptoms and enhance parent-child dyadic social communication over this period. We highlight the value of extended follow-up and repeat assessment for early intervention trials.

Keywords: Pre-emptive intervention; autism; autism spectrum disorder; high-risk siblings; parent-mediated intervention; prevention trials.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Intervention in the British Autism Study of Infant Siblings CONSORT participant flow diagram. *The same family [Colour figure can be viewed at wileyonlinelibrary.com]
Figure 2
Figure 2
Time profile of treatment effects on autism symptoms and caregiver–child interaction (‘area’ = area between curves estimation; see text). The effect size difference is shown by holding TAU as zero. (A) Primary Outcome, Autism Prodromal Symptoms. (The negative effect size reflects a reduction in symptom severity in iBASIS‐VIPP relative to TAU). (B) Parental Dyadic Social Interaction. (C) Child Dyadic Social Interaction
Figure 3
Figure 3
Time profile of effects on Mullen language and Vineland communication and social scores (area = area between curves estimation; see text)

References

    1. Aldred, C. , Green, J. , Emsley, R. , & McConachie, H. (2012). Brief report: Mediation of treatment effect in a communication intervention for pre‐school children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 42, 447–454. - PubMed
    1. Bakermans‐Kranenburg, M.J. , van IJzendoorn, M.H. , & Juffer, F. (2003). Less is more: Meta‐analyses of sensitivity and attachment interventions in early childhood. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 195–215. - PubMed
    1. Baranek, G.T. , Watson, L.R. , Turner‐Brown, L. , Field, S.H. , Crais, E.R. , Wakeford, L. , … & Reznick, J.S. (2015). Preliminary efficacy of adapted responsive teaching for infants at risk of autism spectrum disorder in a community sample. Autism Research and Treatment, 2015, 386951. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bradshaw, J. , Steiner, A.M. , Gengoux, G. , & Koegel, L.K. (2015). Feasibility and effectiveness of very early intervention for infants at‐risk for autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 778–794. - PubMed
    1. Brian, J. , Bryson, S.E. , Garon, N. , Roberts, W. , Smith, I.M. , Szatmari, P. , & Zwaigenbaum, L. (2008). Clinical assessment of autism in high‐risk 18‐month‐olds. Autism: the International Journal of Research and Practice, 12, 433–456. - PubMed

Publication types