Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun;49(2):95-102.
doi: 10.1363/psrh.12024. Epub 2017 Apr 10.

Barriers to Abortion Care and Their Consequences For Patients Traveling for Services: Qualitative Findings from Two States

Jenna Jerman  1 , Lori Frohwirth  2 , Megan L Kavanaugh  3 , Nakeisha Blades  4
Affiliations

Barriers to Abortion Care and Their Consequences For Patients Traveling for Services: Qualitative Findings from Two States

Jenna Jerman et al. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Context: Abortion availability and accessibility vary by state. Especially in areas where services are restricted or limited, some women travel to obtain abortion services in other states. Little is known about the experience of travel to obtain abortion.

Methods: In January and February 2015, in-depth interviews were conducted with 29 patients seeking abortion services at six facilities in Michigan and New Mexico. Eligible women were 18 or older, spoke English, and had traveled either across state lines or more than 100 miles within the state. Respondents were asked to describe their experience from pregnancy discovery to the day of the abortion procedure. Barriers to accessing abortion care and consequences of these barriers were identified through inductive and deductive analysis.

Results: Respondents described 15 barriers to abortion care while traveling to obtain services, and three major consequences of experiencing those barriers. Barriers were grouped into five categories: travel-related logistical issues, system navigation issues, limited clinic options, financial issues, and state or clinic restrictions. Consequences were delays in care, negative mental health impacts and considering self-induction. The experience of barriers complicated the process of obtaining an abortion, but the effect of any individual barrier was unclear. Instead, the experience of multiple barriers appeared to have a compounding effect, resulting in negative consequences for women traveling for abortion.

Conclusion: The amalgamation of barriers to abortion care experienced simultaneously can have significant consequences for patients.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Jones RK, Kavanaugh ML. Changes in abortion rates between 2000 and 2008 and lifetime incidence of abortion. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2011;117(6):1358–1366. - PubMed
    1. Committee on Health Care for Underserved Women. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 613: increasing access to abortion. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2014;124(5):1060–1065. - PubMed
    1. Jones RK, Jerman J. Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2014. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2017 https.doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12015. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jones RK, Jerman J. Time to Appointment and Delays in Accessing Care Among U.S. Abortion Patients. New York: Guttmacher Institute; 2016.
    1. Jones RK, Jerman J. How far did US women travel for abortion services in 2008? Journal of Women’s Health. 2013;22(8):706–713. - PubMed