Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr 10;12(4):e0175383.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175383. eCollection 2017.

Use of a machine learning framework to predict substance use disorder treatment success

Affiliations

Use of a machine learning framework to predict substance use disorder treatment success

Laura Acion et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

There are several methods for building prediction models. The wealth of currently available modeling techniques usually forces the researcher to judge, a priori, what will likely be the best method. Super learning (SL) is a methodology that facilitates this decision by combining all identified prediction algorithms pertinent for a particular prediction problem. SL generates a final model that is at least as good as any of the other models considered for predicting the outcome. The overarching aim of this work is to introduce SL to analysts and practitioners. This work compares the performance of logistic regression, penalized regression, random forests, deep learning neural networks, and SL to predict successful substance use disorders (SUD) treatment. A nationwide database including 99,013 SUD treatment patients was used. All algorithms were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) in a test sample that was not included in the training sample used to fit the prediction models. AUC for the models ranged between 0.793 and 0.820. SL was superior to all but one of the algorithms compared. An explanation of SL steps is provided. SL is the first step in targeted learning, an analytic framework that yields double robust effect estimation and inference with fewer assumptions than the usual parametric methods. Different aspects of SL depending on the context, its function within the targeted learning framework, and the benefits of this methodology in the addiction field are discussed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Analytic work flow.
Fig 2
Fig 2. 95% confidence intervals for AUC of each model compared.

References

    1. Acion L, Ramirez MR, Jorge RE, Arndt S. Increased risk of alcohol and drug use among children from deployed military families. Addiction. 2013;108(8):1418–25. doi: 10.1111/add.12161 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Alang SM. Sociodemographic Disparities Associated With Perceived Causes of Unmet Need for Mental Health Care. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2015;38(4):293 doi: 10.1037/prj0000113 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Glasheen C, Pemberton MR, Lipari R, Copello EA, Mattson ME. Binge drinking and the risk of suicidal thoughts, plans, and attempts. Addictive Behaviors. 2015;43:42–9. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.12.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sahker E, Acion L, Arndt S. National Analysis of Differences Among Substance Abuse Treatment Outcomes: College Student and Nonstudent Emerging Adults. Journal of American College Health. 2015;63(2):118–24. doi: 10.1080/07448481.2014.990970 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gowin JL, Ball TM, Wittmann M, Tapert SF, Paulus MP. Individualized relapse prediction: Personality measures and striatal and insular activity during reward-processing robustly predict relapse. Drug and alcohol dependence. 2015;152:93–101. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.04.018 - DOI - PMC - PubMed