Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 May;14(5):409-418.
doi: 10.1080/14789450.2017.1316977. Epub 2017 Apr 17.

Monitoring proteolytic processing events by quantitative mass spectrometry

Affiliations
Review

Monitoring proteolytic processing events by quantitative mass spectrometry

Mariel Coradin et al. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2017 May.

Abstract

Protease activity plays a key role in a wide variety of biological processes including gene expression, protein turnover and development. misregulation of these proteins has been associated with many cancer types such as prostate, breast, and skin cancer. thus, the identification of protease substrates will provide key information to understand proteolysis-related pathologies. Areas covered: Proteomics-based methods to investigate proteolysis activity, focusing on substrate identification, protease specificity and their applications in systems biology are reviewed. Their quantification strategies, challenges and pitfalls are underlined and the biological implications of protease malfunction are highlighted. Expert commentary: Dysregulated protease activity is a hallmark for some disease pathologies such as cancer. Current biochemical approaches are low throughput and some are limited by the amount of sample required to obtain reliable results. Mass spectrometry based proteomics provides a suitable platform to investigate protease activity, providing information about substrate specificity and mapping cleavage sites.

Keywords: Proteolysis; isotope labeling; mass spectrometry; protease; protease activity; proteomics; substrate recognition.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

10. Declaration of interest

The authors do not have other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Protease nomenclature system. The protease cleavage site occurs between amino acid p1 and p1′. The new N terminus will be located at p1′, which is also known as the neo terminus [5].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Diagram of Terminal Amine Isotopic Labeling of Substrate (TAILS) workflow. In general, after the sample is exposed to the protease, primary amines are chemically protected. After trypsin digestion, a new unlabeled N-terminus is generated, facilitating their binding to the polyglycerol matrix. These peptides are captured after ultracentrifugation [24].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Schematic workflow of Proteomics Identification of Protease Cleavage Sites (PICS). After trypsin digestion, amines are derivatized by reductive methylation and cysteines are blocked with iodoacetamide. The peptide library is then incubated with the protease. Neo peptides are biotinylated and recovered using streptavidin [–65].
Figure 4
Figure 4
COFRADIC approach. For in vivo studies, WT cells and cells where the protease is knocked out (KO) are analyzed. After the whole proteome is extracted, proteins are alkylated. All primary amine are acetylated prior to trypsin digestion. Neo-N-terminal peptides are further identified after multiple chromatographic steps.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Comparison between SPECS and glyco-enrichment method. While SPECS is only applicable to the study of sheddase proteases, glycol-enrichment can also capture peptides derived from intramembrane protease activity.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. van den Berg BHJ, Tholey A. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics strategies for protease cleavage site identification. Proteomics. 2012 Feb;12(4–5):516–529. - PubMed
    1. Puente XS, Sánchez LM, Overall CM, et al. Human and mouse proteases: a comparative genomic approach. Nat Rev Genet. 2003 Jul;4(7):544–558. - PubMed
    1. Turk B. Targeting proteases: successes, failures and future prospects. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006 Sep;5(9):785–799. - PubMed
    1. Turk BE, Huang LL, Piro ET, et al. Determination of protease cleavage site motifs using mixture-based oriented peptide libraries. Nat Biotechnol. 2001 Jul;19(7):661–667. - PubMed
    1. Berger A, Schechter I. Mapping the active site of papain with the aid of peptide substrates and inhibitors. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1970 Feb;257(813):249–264. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources