Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 May 26;372(1721):20160295.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0295.

A review of Phase I trials of Ebola virus vaccines: what can we learn from the race to develop novel vaccines?

Affiliations
Review

A review of Phase I trials of Ebola virus vaccines: what can we learn from the race to develop novel vaccines?

Teresa Lambe et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Sporadic outbreaks of Ebola virus infection have been documented since the mid-Seventies and viral exposure can lead to lethal haemorrhagic fever with case fatalities as high as 90%. There is now a comprehensive body of data from both ongoing and completed clinical trials assessing various vaccine strategies, which were rapidly advanced through clinical trials in response to the 2013-2016 Ebola virus disease (EVD) public health emergency. Careful consideration of immunogenicity post vaccination is essential but has been somewhat stifled because of the wide array of immunological assays and outputs that have been used in the numerous clinical trials. We discuss here the different aspects of the immune assays currently used in the Phase I clinical trials for Ebola virus vaccines, and draw comparisons across the immune outputs where possible; various trials have examined both cellular and humoral immunity in European and African cohorts. Assessment of the safety data, the immunological outputs and the ease of field deployment for the various vaccine modalities will help both the scientific community and policy-makers prioritize and potentially license vaccine candidates. If this can be achieved, the next outbreak of Ebola virus, or other emerging pathogen, can be more readily contained and will not have such widespread and devastating consequences.This article is part of the themed issue 'The 2013-2016 West African Ebola epidemic: data, decision-making and disease control'.

Keywords: Ebola virus; T cell; antibody; clinical trial; emerging pathogens; vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Schematic representation of potential multivalent vaccine strategies targeting WHO priority emerging pathogens. Diseases are broadly grouped according to geographical distribution and incidence. MERS, Middle East respiratory syndrome; SARS, severe acute respiratory syndrome; CCHF, Crimean–Condo haemorrhagic fever; SFTS, severe fever with thrombocytopenia.

References

    1. WHO. Situation Report: Ebola virus disease, 10 June 2016.http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/208883/1/ebolasitrep_10Jun2016_.... (accessed 10 June 2016).
    1. Tully CM, Lambe T, Gilbert SC, Hill AV. 2015. Emergency Ebola response: a new approach to the rapid design and development of vaccines against emerging diseases. Lancet Infect. Dis. 15, 356–359. (10.1016/S1473-3099(14)71071-0) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kuhn JH, et al. 2014. Virus nomenclature below the species level: a standardized nomenclature for filovirus strains and variants rescued from cDNA. Arch. Virol. 159, 1229–1237. (10.1007/s00705-013-1877-2) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hashiguchi T, et al. 2015. Structural basis for Marburg virus neutralization by a cross-reactive human antibody. Cell 160, 904–912. (10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.041) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stanley DA, et al. 2014. Chimpanzee adenovirus vaccine generates acute and durable protective immunity against ebolavirus challenge. Nat. Med. 20, 1126–1129. (10.1038/nm.3702) - DOI - PubMed