Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Mar 27:4:8.
doi: 10.3389/fnut.2017.00008. eCollection 2017.

Proteome Profiles of Digested Products of Commercial Meat Sources

Affiliations

Proteome Profiles of Digested Products of Commercial Meat Sources

Li Li et al. Front Nutr. .

Abstract

This study was designed to characterize in vitro-digested products of proteins from four commercial meat products, including dry-cured ham, cooked ham, emulsion-type sausage, and dry-cured sausage. The samples were homogenized and incubated with pepsin and trypsin. The digestibility and particle sizes of digested products were measured. Nano-LC-MS/MS was applied to characterize peptides. The results showed the highest digestibility and the lowest particle size in dry-cured ham (P < 0.05), while the opposite was for cooked ham (P < 0.05). Nano-LC-MS/MS analysis revealed that dry-cured ham samples had the greatest number of 750-3,500 Da Mw peptides in pepsin-digested products. In the digested products of cooked ham and emulsion-type sausage, a lot of peptides were matched with soy protein that was added in the formulations. In addition, protein oxidation was also observed in different meat products. Our findings give an insight into nutritional values of different meat products.

Keywords: LC–MS/MS; digestibility; in vitro digestion; meat products; oxidation; particle size.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
In vitro protein digestibility of four meat products (means ± SDs, n = 7). a, b, different letters indicated significant differences in digestibility after pepsin digestion; x, y, z, different letters indicated significant differences in digestibility after trypsin digestion.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Representative total ion chromatogram spectra of ethanol-soluble fragments from in vitro digested products of four meat products. (A)In vitro digestion with pepsin; (B) in vitro digestion with pepsin followed by trypsin.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Statistics of peptides from in vitro-digested products of four meat products. (A) General statistics for pepsin and trypsin digesta. For cooked ham, 33 of 114 peptides in pepsin digesta were matched with soy proteins, and 80 of 628 peptides in pepsin/trypsin digesta were matched with soy proteins. For cooked emulsion sausage, 43 of 78 peptides in pepsin digesta and 132 of 311 peptides in pepsin/trypsin digesta were matched with soy proteins. (B,C) Statistics of peptides on the basis of molecular weights after pepsin and trypsin digestion, respectively.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Venn diagrams of peptides obtained from meat products (n = 7). (A) In vitro pepsin digesta. Ten of 25 cooked ham-specific peptides were matched with soy proteins, while 21 of 27 cooked emulsion sausage-specific peptides were matched with soy proteins. (B) In vitro pepsin/pepsin digesta. Fifteen of 145 cooked ham-specific peptides were matched with soy proteins, while 69 of 99 cooked emulsion sausage-specific peptides were matched with soy proteins.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Remond D, Savary-Auzeloux I, Gatellier P, Sante-Lhoutellier V. Nutritional properties of meat peptides and proteins: impact of processing. Sci Des Aliments (2008) 28:389–401.10.3166/sda.28.389-401 - DOI
    1. Gallego M, Mora L, Aristoy MC, Toldra F. Evidence of peptide oxidation from major myofibrillar proteins in dry-cured ham. Food Chem (2015) 187:230–5.10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.04.102 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zhao GM, Zhou GH, Xu XL, Peng ZQ, Huan YJ, Jing ZM, et al. Studies on time-related changes of dipeptidyl peptidase during processing of Jinhua ham using response surface methodology. Meat Sci (2005) 69:165–74.10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.06.018 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Xiong YL. Myofibrillar protein from different muscle-fiber types implications of biochemical and functional-properties in meat processing. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr (1994) 34:293–320.10.1080/10408399409527665 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cofrades S, Jiménez-Colmenero F. Protein molecular interactions involved in the formation of frankfurters: effect of fat level and heating rate. Meat Sci (1998) 49:411–23.10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00006-0 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources