Somatic cell count thresholds in composite and quarter milk samples as indicator of bovine intramammary infection status
- PMID: 28397516
- PMCID: PMC6238690
- DOI: 10.4102/ojvr.v84i1.1269
Somatic cell count thresholds in composite and quarter milk samples as indicator of bovine intramammary infection status
Abstract
The objective of the study was to establish an operational somatic cell count (SCC) threshold to predict the presence of intramammary infection (IMI) in composite milk samples and compare findings with those in quarter milk samples. South African dairy producers now preferred composite milk samples for herd udder health analysis because of increasing cow numbers, convenience of sampling and lower cost. A retrospective study was conducted on 345 461 composite and 89 638 quarter milk samples from South African herds. Variance estimates for the proportion of quarter samples testing positive were adjusted to account for the lack of their independence within individual cows. The IMI at SCC thresholds of 150 000 cells/mL and 200 000 cells/mL differed only by 3.26% in composite milk samples. Youden's index indicated the optimum SCC thresholds for composite and quarter milk samples as 150 000 cells/mL and 200 000 cells/mL, respectively. At 150 000 cells/mL, sensitivity (95% confidence intervals [CI]) in composite milk samples was 65.3% (64.0%, 66.6%) and specificity was 66.8% (65.7%, 67.9%); and in quarter milk samples, sensitivity at 200 000 cells/ mL was 70.8% (69.5%, 72.0%) and specificity was 63.6% (62.4%, 64.8%). The likelihood of infection for udders and quarters, respectively, was 1.034 and 1.327 at an SCC threshold of 150 000 cells/mL and 0.864 cells/mL and 1.177 cells/mL at 200 000 cells/mL. The area under the curve of the receiver operating characteristics graph was 0.7084 and 0.7277 for composite and quarter samples, respectively, indicating that the SCC test could be considered as a good indicator of IMI in both sample types.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships that may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.
References
-
- Ampe B., Goethals K., Laevens H. & Duchateau L, 2012, ‘Investigating clustering in interval-censored udder quarter infection times in dairy cows using a gamma frailty model’, Preventive Veterinary Medicine 106, 251–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2012.04.004 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Barkema H.W, Van der Ploeg J.D., Schukken Y.H., Lam T.J.G.M., Benedictus G. & Brand A, 1999, ‘Management style and its association with bulk milk somatic cell count and rate of clinical mastitis’, Journal of Dairy Science 82, 1655–1663. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75394-4 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Biggs A.M, 2009, ‘Optimising the use of SCC information’, in Proceedings of the British Mastitis Conference 2009, Stoneleigh Park, The Dairy Group, The University of Nottingham and Dairy Co, pp. 15–26.
-
- DeGraves F.J. & Fetrow J, 1993, ‘Economics of mastitis and mastitis control’, Veterinary Clinics of North American: Food Animal Practice 9(3), 421–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-0720(15)30611-3 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dohoo I.R. & Leslie K.E, 1991, ‘Evaluation of changes in somatic cell counts as indicators of new intra-mammary infections’, Preventive Veterinary Medicine 10, 225–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-5877(91)90006-N - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials