Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Apr 8;18(4):792.
doi: 10.3390/ijms18040792.

Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Homeostasis in Reproductive Physiology and Pathology

Affiliations
Review

Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Homeostasis in Reproductive Physiology and Pathology

Elif Guzel et al. Int J Mol Sci. .

Abstract

The endoplasmic reticulum (ER), comprises 60% of the total cell membrane and interacts directly or indirectly with several cell organelles i.e., Golgi bodies, mitochondria and proteasomes. The ER is usually associated with large numbers of attached ribosomes. During evolution, ER developed as the specific cellular site of synthesis, folding, modification and trafficking of secretory and cell-surface proteins. The ER is also the major intracellular calcium storage compartment that maintains cellular calcium homeostasis. During the production of functionally effective proteins, several ER-specific molecular steps sense quantity and quality of synthesized proteins as well as proper folding into their native structures. During this process, excess accumulation of unfolded/misfolded proteins in the ER lumen results in ER stress, the homeostatic coping mechanism that activates an ER-specific adaptation program, (the unfolded protein response; UPR) to increase ER-associated degradation of structurally and/or functionally defective proteins, thus sustaining ER homeostasis. Impaired ER homeostasis results in aberrant cellular responses, contributing to the pathogenesis of various diseases. Both female and male reproductive tissues undergo highly dynamic cellular, molecular and genetic changes such as oogenesis and spermatogenesis starting in prenatal life, mainly controlled by sex-steroids but also cytokines and growth factors throughout reproductive life. These reproductive changes require ER to provide extensive protein synthesis, folding, maturation and then their trafficking to appropriate cellular location as well as destroying unfolded/misfolded proteins via activating ER-associated degradation mediated proteasomes. Many studies have now shown roles for ER stress/UPR signaling cascades in the endometrial menstrual cycle, ovarian folliculogenesis and oocyte maturation, spermatogenesis, fertilization, pre-implantation embryo development and pregnancy and parturition. Conversely, the contribution of impaired ER homeostasis by severe/prolong ER stress-mediated UPR signaling pathways to several reproductive tissue pathologies including endometriosis, cancers, recurrent pregnancy loss and pregnancy complications associated with pre-term birth have been reported. This review focuses on ER stress and UPR signaling mechanisms, and their potential roles in female and male reproductive physiopathology involving in menstrual cycle changes, gametogenesis, preimplantation embryo development, implantation and placentation, labor, endometriosis, pregnancy complications and preterm birth as well as reproductive system tumorigenesis.

Keywords: decidua; endoplasmic reticulum stress; ovary; placenta; testes; uterus.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) homeostasis/stress and the unfolded protein response (UPR) signaling in physiopathologic conditions. The UPR consists of three signaling pathways initiated by detachment of upstream transducers activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6), protein kinase R (PKR)-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK) and inositol-requiring enzyme 1 (IRE1) from glucose-regulated protein 78 (GRP78), a chaperone protein that monitors accumulation of unfolded and misfolded proteins inside the ER lumen. (A) In physiological (unstressed) states, these transducers bind to the folding chaperone GRP78 and keep the ER quiescent; (B) ER stress inducers accumulate unfolded/misfolded proteins in the ER lumen by impairing protein folding. Higher GRP78 affinity for unfolded/misfolded proteins dissociates GRP78 from ATF6, PERK and IRE1, enabling GRP78 unfolded/misfolded protein binding that then initiates three UPR signaling cascades. Specifically: (1) ATF6 signaling involves its translocation to Golgi apparatus for proteolytic cleavage by site-1 protease (S1P) and site-2 protease (S2P) and subsequent release into the nucleus as an active transcription factor to induce expression of GRP78, ubiquitously expressed X-box binding protein 1 (XBP1u) etc.; (2) PERK signaling consist of auto-phosphorylation of PERK (P-PERK), generating an active kinase that phosphorylates eukaryotic translation-initiation factor 2α (P-eIF2α). P-eIF2α blocks its translation initiating activity and induces ATF4 phosphorylation (P-ATF4) leading to P-ATF4 nuclear translocation as a transcription factor to induce expression of GRP78, C/EBP homologous protein (CHOP), XBPu etc.; (3) IRE1α signaling includes IRE1α phosphorylation (P-IRE1α), an active endonuclease that cleaves XBP-1u mRNA to XBP-1s mRNA, which is then translated to an active transcription factor to induce UPR target genes encoding GRP78, ERAD proteins etc. Thus, by increasing ER chaperone protein levels and blocking of eIF2α-mediated protein synthesis, UPR signaling adjusts cells to increased ER stress conditions by transporting excess unfolded/misfolded proteins to ERAD-complex for proteasome-mediated degradation, thereby re-establishing ER homeostasis and sustaining cell survival, whereas prolonged and/or severe ER stress induces apoptosis by CHOP activation, ER-linked caspase 12-mediated caspase 3 cleavage and/or ER Ca2+ efflux associated mitochondrial cytochrome-c release.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Endometrial regulation and role of ER stress during menstrual cycle and in endometriosis. Human endometrium undergoes several cellular, molecular and morphologic changes during menstrual cycle. (A) In situ studies demonstrate increased GRP78 expression during late secretory and early proliferative phases, which may be result from low estradiol (E2) levels and/or pro-inflammatory milieu. In culture, E2 blocks ER stress (tunicamycin)-induced GRP78 expression supporting a role for E2 in favor of ER homeostasis by suppressing GRP78 (ER stress sensor) during the E2 dominated phases of the cycle, which directly or indirectly contributes to angiogenesis, cell proliferation/apoptosis and protein secretion occurring each cycle; (B) Alternatively, significantly high GRP78 levels in ectopic endometriotic tissues may result from increased local E2 production, aberrant sex steroid signaling (progesterone resistance) and/or an enhanced increased inflammatory milieus. These severe/prolonged conditions may activate ER stress/UPR signaling cascades to enhance VEGF expression and induce angiogenesis, required for endometriotic tissue growth. Moreover, significant reduction in estrogenic response in severe ER stress (tunicamycin) condition may contribute to aberrant steroid response in endometriotic tissues.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Regulation and therapeutic targeting of ER stress in reproductive tissue cancers. Several reproductive tissue cancers display increased ER stress chaperone GRP78 and the UPR signaling proteins ATF6, PERK and IRE levels in situ, indicating increased ER stress with a cancer cell specific adaptation to the stress condition via increased autophagy activities to degrade unfolded/misfolded protein as well as enhanced ER protein folding capacity, which result in ER homeostasis, thereby supporting growth and invasion of tumor cells. Several studies reported that disruption of cancer cell specific adaption to severe/prolong ER stress by chemotherapeutic agents (cisplatin, paclitaxel) or naturally occurring agents (curcumin, resveratrol etc.) can reduce cancer cell proliferation and invasion and increase apoptosis, resulting in tumor growth regression.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Role of ER stress in spermatogenesis. Increased protein synthesis and/or degradation to compensate intracellular, membranous, biochemical and structural changes during spermatogenesis assign a central role to the ER in coordinating these events. Several reports indicate that testicular hyperthermia induces UPR signaling cascades suggesting that increased ER stress may impair spermatogenesis. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals bisphenol-A and diethylstilbestrol and cadmium, an environmental toxicant, are reported to cause severe ER stress by elevating IRE1α phosphorylation and CHOP expression in spermatozoa. The resulting increased CHOP expression then triggers apoptosis via activating caspase 3 in sperm, which may reduce or eliminate fertilization capacity.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Regulation and the impact of ER stress/UPR signaling cascades during oogenesis and preimplantation. During folliculogenesis, enhanced IRE1α, PERK, GRP78 and XPB1s levels in the granulosa cells of large secondary follicles and later stages as well as elevated XBP1s levels in cumulus cells from fertilized oocytes indicate physiological involvement of UPR signaling during oogenesis and fertilization. However, increased fatty acid levels and obesity can dysregulate protein secretion and mitochondrial activity by impairing ER homeostasis, causing abnormal embryonic development. Salubrinal treatment of cumulus-oocyte complex maintains normal preimplantation embryo development by reversing these conditions. The preimplantation embryo also requires extensive protein synthesis for proper development and implantation. Severe ER stress induced by tunicamycin in 2-cell stage embryos does not affect development until the end of morula stage. However, severe ER stress impairs blastocyst formation via extensive apoptosis. Use of TUDCA completely reverses these negative effects, indicating that ER homeostasis is crucial during blastocyst formation and subsequent development.

References

    1. Porter K.R., Claude A., Fullam E.F. A study of tissue culture cells by electron microscopy: Methods and preliminary observations. J. Exp. Med. 1945;81:233–246. doi: 10.1084/jem.81.3.233. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Porter K.R., Kallman F.L. Significance of cell particulates as seen by electron microscopy. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1952;54:882–891. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1952.tb39963.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Simonyi I., Pataki S., Kalman K., Buda L. Determination of the active ingredient content in Tavegyl tablets. Acta Pharm. Hung. 1975;45:237–244. - PubMed
    1. Wischnitzer S. The nuclear envelope: Its ultrastructure and functional significance. Endeavour. 1974;33:137–142. doi: 10.1016/0160-9327(74)90036-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Krebs J., Agellon L.B., Michalak M. Ca2+ homeostasis and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress: An integrated view of calcium signaling. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2015;460:114–121. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.02.004. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources