Listening Effort Through Depth of Processing in School-Age Children
- PMID: 28399062
- DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000436
Listening Effort Through Depth of Processing in School-Age Children
Abstract
Objectives: A reliable and practical measure of listening effort is crucial in the aural rehabilitation of children with communication disorders. In this article, we propose a novel behavioral paradigm designed to measure listening effort in school-age children based on different depths and levels of verbal processing. The paradigm consists of a classic word recognition task performed in quiet and in noise coupled to one of three additional tasks asking the children to judge the color of simple pictures or a certain semantic category of the presented words. The response time (RT) from the categorization tasks is considered the primary indicator of listening effort.
Design: The listening effort paradigm was evaluated in a group of 31 normal-hearing, normal-developing children 7 to 12 years of age. A total of 146 Dutch nouns were selected for the experiment after surveying 14 local Dutch-speaking children. Windows-based custom software was developed to administer the behavioral paradigm from a conventional laptop computer. A separate touch screen was used as a response interface to gather the RT data from the participants. Verbal repetition of each presented word was scored by the tester and a percentage-correct word recognition score (WRS) was calculated for each condition. Randomized lists of target words were presented in one of three signal to noise ratios (SNR) to examine the effect of background noise on the two outcome measures of WRS and RT. Three novel categorization tasks, each corresponding to a different depth or elaboration level of semantic processing, were developed to examine the effect of processing level on either WRS or RT. It was hypothesized that, while listening effort as measured by RT would be affected by both noise and processing level, WRS performance would be affected by changes in noise level only. The RT measure was also hypothesized to increase more from an increase in noise level in categorization conditions demanding a deeper or more elaborate form of semantic processing.
Results: There was a significant effect of SNR level on school-age children's WRS: their word recognition performance tended to decrease with increasing background noise level. However, depth of processing did not seem to affect WRS. Moreover, a repeated-measure analysis of variance fitted to transformed RT data revealed that this measure of listening effort in normal-hearing school-age children was significantly affected by both SNR level and the depth of semantic processing. There was no significant interaction between noise level and the type of categorization task with regard to RT.
Conclusions: The observed patterns of WRS and RT supported the hypotheses regarding the effects of background noise and depth of processing on word recognition performance and a behavioral measure of listening effort. The magnitude of noise-induced change in RT did not differ between categorization tasks, however. Our findings point to future research directions regarding the potential effects of age, working memory capacity, and cross-modality interaction when measuring listening effort in different levels of semantic processing.
Similar articles
-
The effect of noise on listening effort in children as measured using different methods: a systematic review and meta-analyses.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Jun;282(6):2855-2886. doi: 10.1007/s00405-025-09232-z. Epub 2025 Feb 8. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025. PMID: 39921717
-
Age-Related Changes in Listening Effort for Children and Teenagers With Normal Hearing and Cochlear Implants.Ear Hear. 2021 May/Jun;42(3):506-519. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000953. Ear Hear. 2021. PMID: 33109991
-
The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.Ear Hear. 2014 Nov-Dec;35(6):611-22. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000055. Ear Hear. 2014. PMID: 24992491
-
Behavioral Measures of Listening Effort in School-Age Children: Examining the Effects of Signal-to-Noise Ratio, Hearing Loss, and Amplification.Ear Hear. 2019 Mar/Apr;40(2):381-392. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000623. Ear Hear. 2019. PMID: 29905670
-
Effects of Noise and a Speaker's Impaired Voice Quality on Spoken Language Processing in School-Aged Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022 Jan 12;65(1):169-199. doi: 10.1044/2021_JSLHR-21-00183. Epub 2021 Dec 13. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2022. PMID: 34902257
Cited by
-
Listening Effort in School-Aged Children With Limited Useable Hearing Unilaterally: Examining the Effects of a Personal, Digital Remote Microphone System and a Contralateral Routing of Signal System.Trends Hear. 2021 Jan-Dec;25:2331216520984700. doi: 10.1177/2331216520984700. Trends Hear. 2021. PMID: 33602042 Free PMC article.
-
Dual-Task Paradigm Measures of Listening Effort: To Include or Not to Include Secondary Task Responses with Incorrect Primary Task Responses.Semin Hear. 2023 Mar 28;44(2):155-165. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1766140. eCollection 2023 May. Semin Hear. 2023. PMID: 37122880 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Exploring the Correlations Between Measures of Listening Effort in Adults and Children: A Systematic Review with Narrative Synthesis.Trends Hear. 2023 Jan-Dec;27:23312165221137116. doi: 10.1177/23312165221137116. Trends Hear. 2023. PMID: 36636020 Free PMC article.
-
Moderate Reverberation Does Not Increase Subjective Fatigue, Subjective Listening Effort, or Behavioral Listening Effort in School-Aged Children.Front Psychol. 2019 Aug 2;10:1749. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01749. eCollection 2019. Front Psychol. 2019. PMID: 31428016 Free PMC article.
-
The effect of noise on listening effort in children as measured using different methods: a systematic review and meta-analyses.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Jun;282(6):2855-2886. doi: 10.1007/s00405-025-09232-z. Epub 2025 Feb 8. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025. PMID: 39921717
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical