Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2017 Sep;14(9):1353-1361.
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.04.003. Epub 2017 Apr 8.

Permanent His-bundle pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: Initial feasibility study in lieu of left ventricular lead

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Permanent His-bundle pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: Initial feasibility study in lieu of left ventricular lead

Olujimi A Ajijola et al. Heart Rhythm. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Permanent His-bundle pacing (HBP) has the potential to physiologically normalize wide QRS duration in patients with bundle branch block and cardiomyopathy.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of incorporating a His-bundle lead for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in lieu of a coronary sinus lead.

Methods: Patients with an indication for CRT (n = 21) underwent attempted implantation of an HBP placed into the left ventricular (LV) lead port. Intracardiac intervals, QRS duration, New York Heart Association functional class, ejection fraction (EF), echocardiography, and lead characteristics were measured at baseline and at follow-up.

Results: Of the 21 patients in whom implantation was attempted, HBP was successfully implanted in 16 (age 62 ± 18 years, 4 females, EF 25 ± 8). A significant reduction in mean QRS was observed, with narrowing from 180 ± 23 ms to 129 ± 13 ms (P <.0001). During the follow-up period, median New York Heart Association functional class improved from III to II (P <.001), and mean LV EF and left ventricular internal dimension in diastole (LVIDd) improved from 27% ± 10% to 41% ± 13% (P <.001) and from 5.4 ± 0.4 cm to 4.5 ± 0.3 cm (P <.001), respectively. At median 12-month follow-up, no dislodgments were observed, and only one patient lost nonselective capture that resolved with increased pacing output.

Conclusion: Permanent HBP is feasible for patients with an indication for CRT using the LV port in lieu of a coronary sinus lead. In this initial experience, narrowing of QRS duration was achieved in 76% of patients with bundle branch block, and improvements in clinical and echocardiographic measures were observed with HBP. Future prospective comparative studies with HBP to achieve CRT are justifiable.

Keywords: Bundle branch block; Cardiac resynchronization; Heart failure; His bundle; Pacing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms