Clinical comparison of the efficacy of three different bowel preparation methods on the infectious complications following transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy in nursing practice
- PMID: 28401738
- DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13854
Clinical comparison of the efficacy of three different bowel preparation methods on the infectious complications following transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy in nursing practice
Abstract
Aims and objectives: To assess the effects of three different bowel preparation methods on the incidence of infectious complications in patients who underwent transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy.
Background: The standard bowel preparation protocol for prostate biopsy has not been established.
Design: A retrospective study in a single centre.
Methods: From January 2013-December 2015, the clinical records of 1,130 patients who underwent prostate biopsy were, respectively, reviewed. All the patients received metronidazole prophylaxis before biopsy. The patients were divided into three groups according to the bowel preparation methods: patients in Group A (n = 402) received only soapy enema; patients in Group B (n = 413) received polyethylene glycol; while patients in Group C (n = 315) received polyethylene glycol plus povidone-iodine enema. Infectious complications were classified as fever (>37.5°C), urinary tract infection and sepsis. The postoperative adverse events were also observed.
Results: The overall postbiopsy infectious complications were observed in 48 (4.25%) patients of all the cases, including 23 (5.72%) cases in Group A, 20 (4.84%) cases in Group B and five patients (1.59%) in Group C. There was significant difference among the groups (p = .018). In detail, these infectious complications included 22 (1.95%) cases of fever and 26 (2.30%) cases of urinary tract infection. No sepsis was observed among the total patients. The incidence of adverse events was 14.43% (58/402) occurred in Group A, 25.91% (107/413) in Group B and 26.67% (84/315) in Group C. The difference was statistically significant.
Conclusions: Our study confirmed that combined preparation regimens of polyethylene glycol with povidone-iodine enema could significantly reduce the postbiopsy infection rate. Conventional soapy enema is associated with less adverse events.
Relevance to clinical practice: Findings of this study provide useful evidence-based information for healthcare professionals. The application of combined preparation regimens of polyethylene glycol with povidone-iodine enema resulted in better improvement in the prevention of postbiopsy infection.
Keywords: bowel preparation; infectious complications; polyethylene glycol; povidone-iodine; prostate biopsy; prostate cancer; rectal enema.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Similar articles
-
Risk factors for and prophylactic effect of povidone-iodine rectal cleansing on infectious complications after prostate biopsy: a retrospective cohort study.Int Urol Nephrol. 2015 Apr;47(4):595-601. doi: 10.1007/s11255-015-0931-2. Epub 2015 Feb 25. Int Urol Nephrol. 2015. PMID: 25712677
-
A prospective randomized trial of povidone-iodine prophylactic cleansing of the rectum before transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy.J Urol. 2013 Apr;189(4):1326-31. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.121. Epub 2012 Oct 2. J Urol. 2013. PMID: 23041343 Clinical Trial.
-
Control of infective complications of transrectal prostate biopsy.Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014 Aug;15(4):431-6. doi: 10.1089/sur.2013.138. Epub 2014 May 19. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2014. PMID: 24840927
-
Nonantibiotic Strategies for the Prevention of Infectious Complications following Prostate Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Urol. 2021 Mar;205(3):653-663. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001399. Epub 2020 Oct 7. J Urol. 2021. PMID: 33026903
-
The effect of povidone-iodine rectal cleansing on post-biopsy infectious complications.Scand J Urol. 2023 Feb-Dec;57(1-6):47-52. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2022.2151644. Epub 2022 Dec 1. Scand J Urol. 2023. PMID: 36453188 Review.
Cited by
-
Topical rectal antiseptic at time of prostate biopsy: how a resident patient safety project has evolved into institutional practice.Int Urol Nephrol. 2018 Sep;50(9):1563-1568. doi: 10.1007/s11255-018-1937-3. Epub 2018 Jul 17. Int Urol Nephrol. 2018. PMID: 30019310
-
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Stockholm 3 Testing Compared to PSA as the Primary Blood Test in the Prostate Cancer Diagnostic Pathway: A Decision Tree Approach.Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2022 Nov;20(6):867-880. doi: 10.1007/s40258-022-00741-0. Epub 2022 Aug 8. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2022. PMID: 35934771 Free PMC article.
-
Risk factors for infectious complications following transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy.Infect Drug Resist. 2018 Sep 17;11:1491-1497. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S171162. eCollection 2018. Infect Drug Resist. 2018. PMID: 30271182 Free PMC article.
-
Preliminary study on ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy specimen scores.Exp Ther Med. 2017 Sep;14(3):2619-2624. doi: 10.3892/etm.2017.4800. Epub 2017 Jul 18. Exp Ther Med. 2017. PMID: 28962203 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical