Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2017 Jul 1;65(1):46-54.
doi: 10.1093/cid/cix247.

Comparing the Efficacy of Drug Regimens for Pulmonary Tuberculosis: Meta-analysis of Endpoints in Early-Phase Clinical Trials

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Comparing the Efficacy of Drug Regimens for Pulmonary Tuberculosis: Meta-analysis of Endpoints in Early-Phase Clinical Trials

Laura J Bonnett et al. Clin Infect Dis. .

Abstract

Background: A systematic review of early clinical outcomes in tuberculosis was undertaken to determine ranking of efficacy of drugs and combinations, define variability of these measures on different endpoints, and to establish the relationships between them.

Methods: Studies were identified by searching PubMed, Medline, Embase, LILACS (Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature), and reference lists of included studies. Outcomes were early bactericidal activity results over 2, 7, and 14 days, and the proportion of patients with negative culture at 8 weeks.

Results: One hundred thirty-three trials reporting phase 2A (early bactericidal activity) and phase 2B (culture conversion at 2 months) outcomes were identified. Only 9 drug combinations were assessed on >1 phase 2A endpoint and only 3 were assessed in both phase 2A and 2B trials.

Conclusions: The existing evidence base supporting phase 2 methodology in tuberculosis is highly incomplete. In future, a broader range of drugs and combinations should be more consistently studied across a greater range of phase 2 endpoints.

Keywords: efficacy; meta-analysis; tuberculosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Literature review process.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Drug combinations of included studies. Abbreviations: E, ethambutol; G, gatifloxacin; H, isoniazid; J, bedaquiline; L, levofloxacin; M, moxifloxacin; O, ofloxacin; P, para-aminosalicylic acid; Pa, PA-824/pretomanid; R, rifampicin; Rb, rifabutin; Rp, rifapentine; S, streptomycin; T, thiacetazone; Z, pyrazinamide.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Results of early bactericidal activity over 2 days (fixed effects, generalized inverse variance method). Abbreviations: CFU, colony-forming units; E, ethambutol; EBA, early bactericidal activity; G, gatifloxacin; H, isoniazid; J, bedaquiline; L, levofloxacin; M, moxifloxacin; O, ofloxacin; P, para-aminosalicylic acid; Pa, PA-824/pretomanid; R, rifampicin; Rb, rifabutin; Rp, rifapentine; S, streptomycin; T, thiacetazone; Z, pyrazinamide.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Results of early bactericidal activity over 7 days (fixed effects, generalized inverse variance method). Abbreviations: CFU, colony-forming units; E, ethambutol; EBA, early bactericidal activity; H, isoniazid; J, bedaquiline; M, moxifloxacin; Pa, PA-824/pretomanid; R, rifampicin; Z, pyrazinamide.
Figure 5.
Figure 5.
Results of early bactericidal activity over 14 days (fixed effects, generalized inverse variance method). Abbreviations: CFU, colony-forming units; E, ethambutol; EBA, early bactericidal activity; G, gatifloxacin; H, isoniazid; J, bedaquiline; M, moxifloxacin; Pa, PA-824/pretomanid; R, rifampicin; Z, pyrazinamide.
Figure 6.
Figure 6.
Culture negativity at 8 weeks: solid culture (random effects, DerSimonian and Laird method). Abbreviations: -ve, negative; E, ethambutol; G, gatifloxacin; H, isoniazid; J, bedaquiline; L, levofloxacin; M, moxifloxacin; O, ofloxacin; P, para-aminosalicylic acid; Pa, PA-824/pretomanid; R, rifampicin; Rb, rifabutin; Rp, rifapentine; S, streptomycin; T, thiacetazone; Z, pyrazinamide.
Figure 7.
Figure 7.
Culture negativity at 8 weeks: liquid culture (random effects, DerSimonian and Laird method). Abbreviations: -ve, negative; E, ethambutol; G, gatifloxacin; H, isoniazid; M, moxifloxacin; O, ofloxacin; R, rifampicin; Rp, rifapentine; Z, pyrazinamide.
Figure 8.
Figure 8.
Culture negativity at 8 weeks: solid and liquid culture (random effects, DerSimonian and Laird method). Abbreviations: -ve, negative; E, ethambutol; H, isoniazid; M, moxifloxacin; P, para-aminosalicylic acid; R, rifampicin; Rb, rifabutin; Z, pyrazinamide.

Comment in

References

    1. Lienhardt C, Raviglione M, Spigelman M, et al. New drugs for the treatment of tuberculosis: needs, challenges, promise, and prospects for the future. J Infect Dis 2012; 205(suppl 2):S241–9. - PubMed
    1. Donald PR, Diacon AH. The early bactericidal activity of anti-tuberculosis drugs: a literature review. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 2008; 88(suppl 1):S75–83. - PubMed
    1. Jindani A, Aber VR, Edwards EA, Mitchison DA. The early bactericidal activity of drugs in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Am Rev Respir Dis 1980; 121:939–49. - PubMed
    1. Diacon AH, Dawson R, von Groote-Bidlingmaier F, et al. 14-day bactericidal activity of PA-824, bedaquiline, pyrazinamide, and moxifloxacin combinations: a randomised trial. Lancet 2012; 380:986–93. - PubMed
    1. Rustomjee R, Lienhardt C, Kanyok T, et al. ; Gatifloxacin for TB (OFLOTUB) study team A phase II study of the sterilising activities of ofloxacin, gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin in pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2008; 12:128–38. - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances