Coverage and Utilization in Food Fortification Programs: Critical and Neglected Areas of Evaluation
- PMID: 28404835
- PMCID: PMC5404214
- DOI: 10.3945/jn.116.246157
Coverage and Utilization in Food Fortification Programs: Critical and Neglected Areas of Evaluation
Abstract
The need for evidence to inform nutrition program design and implementation has long been recognized, yet the generation and use of evidence for program decision making has lagged. The results of the coverage surveys reported in this supplement highlight some of the strengths and areas for improvement of current population-based (i.e., staple foods and condiments) and targeted (e.g., foods for infants and young children) fortification programs. Among other topics, the results identify a few striking successful fortification programs whereby the majority of the food vehicle used is fortifiable and fortified, and coverage is equitable among those classified as vulnerable and not. Other programs have great potential based on very high use of a fortifiable food vehicle, including in most cases among the vulnerable, but that potential is not currently reached because of low compliance with fortification requirements. Programs were also identified whereby the food vehicle has limited potential to make public health contributions to micronutrient intake, given the low proportions of the population who consume the food vehicle in general or who consume the fortifiable food vehicle. Four key lessons were learned: 1) the potential for impact of food fortification depends on the appropriate choice of food fortification vehicle but also on the proportion of the food vehicle consumed that is fortifiable; 2) the design of fortification programs should be informed by the magnitude and distribution of inadequate intake and deficiency and consumption of fortifiable foods, and part of micronutrient deficiency control strategies to ensure coordination with other programs; 3) effective quality control of fortification levels in foods urgently needs strengthening, including the many governance and other policy factors that influence the capacity, resources, and commitment to do this; 4) periodic review of the assumptions related to dietary patterns that underpin food fortification is needed to ensure continual safe and impactful programs.
Keywords: coverage; evaluation; impact; large-scale food fortification; salt iodization; targeted fortification; utilization.
Conflict of interest statement
3: Author disclosures: LM Neufeld, S Baker, GS Garrett, and L Haddad, no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- International Food Policy Research Institute. Global Nutrition Report 2016: from promise to impact: ending malnutrition by 2030 [Internet]. Washington (DC): International Food Policy Research Institute; 2016. [cited 2016 Dec 7]. Available from: http://ebrary.ifpri.org/utils/getfile/collection/p15738coll2/id/130354/f....
-
- Gillespie S, Haddad L, Mannar V, Menon P, Nisbett N; Maternal and Child Nutrition Study Group. The politics of reducing malnutrition: building commitment and accelerating progress. Lancet 2013;382:552–69. - PubMed
-
- WHO FAO. Guidelines on food fortification with micronutrients [Internet]. 2006 [cited 2016 Sep 17]. Available from: http://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/guide_food_fortification_micro....
-
- UNICEF. Expanded iodine data (internal report). New York: UNICEF; 2013.
-
- Food Fortification Initiative (FFI). Global progress [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2016 Sep 2]. Available from: http://www.ffinetwork.org/global_progress/index.php.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
