Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017;23(1):38-61.
doi: 10.1080/13229400.2016.1176588. Epub 2016 Jun 3.

When and Why Parents Prompt Their Children to Apologize: The Roles of Transgression Type and Parenting Style

Affiliations

When and Why Parents Prompt Their Children to Apologize: The Roles of Transgression Type and Parenting Style

Craig E Smith et al. J Fam Stud. 2017.

Abstract

Young children are sensitive to the importance of apologies, yet little is known about when and why parents prompt apologies from children. We examined these issues with parents of 3-10-year-old children (N = 483). Parents judged it to be important for children to apologize following both intentional and accidental morally-relevant transgressions, and they anticipated prompting apologies in both contexts, showing an 'outcome bias' (i.e., a concern for the outcomes of children's transgressions rather than for their underlying intentions). Parents viewed apologies as less important after children's breaches of social convention; parents recognized differences between social domains in their responses to children's transgressions. Irrespective of parenting style, parents were influenced in similar fashion by particular combinations of transgressions and victims, though permissive parents were least likely to anticipate prompting apologies. Parents endorsed different reasons for prompting apologies as a function of transgression type, suggesting that they attend to key features of their children's transgressions when deciding when to prompt apologies.

Keywords: apology; moral development; parenting; social domain theory; socialization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Standardized Mean Scores on the Parental Authority Questionnaire Subscales as a Function of Cluster Profile
Figure 2
Figure 2
a and b. Mean Scores on Apology Prompt Likelihood Scale as a Function of Transgression Type, Victim Type, and Parenting Style (The model in Figure 2a controls for parent and child gender, child age, parent education, child birth order, and respondents’ social desirability bias; the more parsimonious model in Figure 2b controls for social desirability bias.)
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean Scores on Apology Prompt Likelihood Scale as a Function of Transgression Type and Victim Type
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean Rating of Apology Importance as a Function of Transgression Type and Parenting Style

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abuhatoum S, Howe N. Power in sibling conflict during early and middle childhood. Social Development. 2013;22(4):738–754.
    1. Alink LRA, Mesman J, van Zeijl J, Stolk MN, Juffer F, Koot HM, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, van IJzendoorn MH. The Early Childhood Aggression Curve: Development of Physical Aggression in 10- to 50-Month-Old Children. Child Development. 2006;77(4):954–966. - PubMed
    1. Anderson JC, Linden W, Habra ME. Influence of Apologies and Trait Hostility on Recovery from Anger. Journal of Behavioral Medicine. 2006;29(4):347–358. - PubMed
    1. Baumrind D. Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology. 1971;4(1, Pt.2):1–103.
    1. Baumrind D. The development of instrumental competence through socialization. In: Pick AD, editor. Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology. Vol. 7. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press; 1973. pp. 3–46.

LinkOut - more resources