Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Feb;5(1):45-53.
doi: 10.1177/2050640616644392. Epub 2016 Jul 7.

The expansion of endoscopic submucosal dissection in France: A prospective nationwide survey

Affiliations

The expansion of endoscopic submucosal dissection in France: A prospective nationwide survey

Maximilien Barret et al. United European Gastroenterol J. 2017 Feb.

Abstract

Introduction: Early reports of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in Europe suggested high complication rates and disappointing outcomes compared to publications from Japan. Since 2008, we have been conducting a nationwide survey to monitor the outcomes and complications of ESD over time.

Material and methods: All consecutive ESD cases from 14 centers in France were prospectively included in the database. Demographic, procedural, outcome and follow-up data were recorded. The results obtained over three years were compared to previously published data covering the 2008-2010 period.

Results: Between November 2010 and June 2013, 319 ESD cases performed in 314 patients (62% male, mean (±SD) age 65.4 ± 12) were analyzed and compared to 188 ESD cases in 188 patients (61% male, mean (±SD) age 64.6 ± 13) performed between January 2008 and October 2010. The mean (±SD) lesion size was 39 ± 12 mm in 2010-2013 vs 32.1 ± 21 for 2008-2010 (p = 0.004). En bloc resection improved from 77.1% to 91.7% (p < 0.0001) while R0 en bloc resection remained stable from 72.9% to 71.9% (p = 0.8) over time. Complication rate dropped from 29.2% between 2008 and 2010 to 14.1% between 2010 and 2013 (p < 0.0001), with bleeding decreasing from 11.2% to 4.7% (p = 0.01) and perforations from 18.1% to 8.1% (p = 0.002) over time. No procedure-related mortality was recorded.

Conclusions: In this multicenter study, ESD achieved high rates of en bloc resection with a significant trend toward better outcomes over time. Improvements in lesion delineation and characterization are still needed to increase R0 resection rates.

Keywords: Endoscopic submucosal dissection; early neoplasm; endoscopic resection; intramucosal cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Endoscopic submucosal dissection knifes used for endoscopic submucosal dissections performed in 2008–2010 vs 2010–2013.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Main outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection per center.

References

    1. Neuhaus H. Endoscopic submucosal dissection in the upper gastrointestinal tract: Present and future view of Europe. Dig Endosc 2009; 21(Suppl 1): S4–S6. - PubMed
    1. Yamamoto H. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early cancers and large flat adenomas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2005; 3(7 Suppl 1): S74–S76. - PubMed
    1. Deprez PH, Bergman JJ, Meisner S, et al. Current practice with endoscopic submucosal dissection in Europe: Position statement from a panel of experts. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 853–858. - PubMed
    1. Bhatt A, Abe S, Kumaravel A, et al. Indications and techniques for endoscopic submucosal dissection. Am J Gastroenterol 2015; 110: 784–791. - PubMed
    1. Probst A, Golger D, Arnholdt H, et al. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early cancers, flat adenomas, and submucosal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 7: 149–155. - PubMed