Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Apr 11:2:11.
doi: 10.1186/s40813-016-0027-0. eCollection 2016.

Production parameters and pig production cost: temporal evolution 2010-2014

Affiliations

Production parameters and pig production cost: temporal evolution 2010-2014

J Rocadembosch et al. Porcine Health Manag. .

Abstract

Background: The assessment of the cost of production and the relative weight of the different production parameters is very important in pig farming. The goals of the present work were 1) to describe reliable reference values for production parameters and pig production cost from 2010 to 2014, 2) to describe their temporal evolution and 3) to determine the influence of the pig company size on them. Between 61 and 107 pig production companies from Spain were included in this study from 2010 to 2014. These companies sent data on feed consumption, number of pig produced, expenses and census every month. Sip consultors SL standardized collected data and calculate cost and production parameters to obtain values comparables between the different pig production companies. The collected data each month were merged to obtain a yearly average value taking into account the pig production flow each month. A suitable statistical analysis was carried out to tackle the goals.

Results: The production performance has been continuously improving in the piglet production and fattening phase from 2010 to 2014. Thus, the number of piglets by sow and year will increase 0.5 pigs by year and the total feed conversion rate will decrease approximately 0.03 kg feed/kg gain by year in the future if the same tendency continues. However, feed price has been steadily increasing from 2010 to 2012 and decreasing afterwards and the total cost per kilogram produced has followed a similar pattern. This result highlights the relevance of the feed price in the final cost in spite of continuous improvement in production performance across years. Finally, pig company size affected most of the production parameters studied. Thus, the best technical parameters were obtained for companies with less than 5000 sows. However, the opposite tendency is observed for feed price where the highest value was observed for the smallest companies.

Conclusions: Pig production parameters have generally improved in the last five years but this improvement did not directly imply a reduction in pig production cost due to the high feed prices during the period 2010-2013.

Keywords: Company size; Cost; Evolution; Parameter production; Pig.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Temporal evolution of number of piglets born alive (a), preweaning mortality (b), number of piglets weaned by sow (c) and number of piglets produced by sow and year (d) during piglet production phase from 2010 to 2014 in Spain. Values with different superscripts differ significantly between years at P < 0.05
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Temporal evolution of sow feed cost (a), kilograms of sow feed per weaned piglet (b) and cost of piglet production (c) during piglet production phase from 2010 to 2014 in Spain. Values with different superscripts differ significantly between years at P < 0.05
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Temporal evolutions of feed cost and cost of production during nursery (a and b) and fattening phase (c and d) from 2010 to 2014 in Spain. Values with different superscripts differ significantly between years at P < 0.05
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Temporal evolution of average daily gain (a), feed conversion rate (b) and fattening mortality (c) during fattening phase from 2010 to 2014 in Spain. Values with different superscripts differ significantly between years at P < 0.05
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Temporal evolution of total feed cost per pig (a), feed conversion rate (b) and total cost per kilogram (c) during the whole rearing period from 2010 to 2014 in Spain. Values with different superscripts differ significantly between years at P < 0.05

References

    1. Faostat 2013. http://faostat3.fao.org/home/E. Accessed 11th September 2014.
    1. De Lange FM, Dewey C. In: Management of growing-finishing pigs, chapter 6, Disease of swine. 9. Straw BE, Zimmerman J, D’Allaire S, Taylor DJ, editors. Ames, IA: Blackwell Publishing; 2009.
    1. Holden P. Swine costs and production. Agri-practice. 1991;12:46–8.
    1. Losinger WC. Economic impacts of reduced pork production associated with the diagnosis of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae on grower/finisher swine operations in the United States. Prev Vet Med. 2005;68:181–93. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2004.12.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fenwick B. Relationship between vaccination and management in assuring profitable pork production. Animal Health Res Rev. 2004;5:267–9. doi: 10.1079/AHR200481. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources