Ten Important Considerations for Ovarian Cancer Screening
- PMID: 28406427
- PMCID: PMC5489942
- DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics7020022
Ten Important Considerations for Ovarian Cancer Screening
Abstract
The unique intricacies of ovarian cancer screening and perspectives of different screening methods are presented as ten considerations that are examined. Included in these considerations are: (1) Deciding on the number of individuals to be screened; (2) Anticipating screening group reductions due to death; (3) Deciding on the duration and frequency of screening; (4) Deciding on an appropriate follow-up period after screening; (5) Deciding on time to surgery when malignancy is suspected; (6) Deciding on how screen-detected ovarian cancers are treated and by whom; (7) Deciding on how to treat the data of enrolled participants; (8) Deciding on the most appropriate way to assign disease-specific death; (9) Deciding how to avoid biases caused by enrollments that attract participants with late-stage disease who are either symptomatic or disposed by factors that are genetic, environmental or social; and (10) Deciding whether the screening tool or a screening process is being tested. These considerations are presented in depth along with illustrations of how they impact the outcomes of ovarian cancer screening. The considerations presented provide alternative explanations of effects that have an important bearing on interpreting ovarian screening outcomes.
Keywords: cancer; considerations; ovarian; screening.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declares no conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Results from an ultrasound-based familial ovarian cancer screening clinic: a 10-year observational study.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Apr;21(4):378-85. doi: 10.1002/uog.65. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2003. PMID: 12704748
-
Evidence of Stage Shift in Women Diagnosed With Ovarian Cancer During Phase II of the United Kingdom Familial Ovarian Cancer Screening Study.J Clin Oncol. 2017 May 1;35(13):1411-1420. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.9330. Epub 2017 Feb 27. J Clin Oncol. 2017. PMID: 28240969 Free PMC article.
-
Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.Oncologist. 1996;1(5):326-330. Oncologist. 1996. PMID: 10388011
-
Current status of screening for ovarian cancer.Gynecol Oncol. 1994 Dec;55(3 Pt 2):S34-7. doi: 10.1006/gyno.1994.1338. Gynecol Oncol. 1994. PMID: 7835807 Review.
-
Ovarian cancer screening.Semin Oncol. 1998 Jun;25(3):315-25. Semin Oncol. 1998. PMID: 9633843 Review.
Cited by
-
The Effects of the Dietary and Nutrient Intake on Gynecologic Cancers.Healthcare (Basel). 2019 Jul 7;7(3):88. doi: 10.3390/healthcare7030088. Healthcare (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31284691 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ovarian Cancer Screening: Lessons about Effectiveness.Diagnostics (Basel). 2017 Dec 29;8(1):1. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics8010001. Diagnostics (Basel). 2017. PMID: 29286290 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer using a combined protein biomarker panel.Br J Cancer. 2019 Sep;121(6):483-489. doi: 10.1038/s41416-019-0544-0. Epub 2019 Aug 7. Br J Cancer. 2019. PMID: 31388184 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Handford M. Where’s Waldo? Candlewick Press; Somerville, MA, USA: 2012.
-
- Daoud E., Bodor G. CA-125 concentrations in malignant and nonmalignant disease. Clin. Chem. 1991;37:1968–1974. - PubMed
-
- Nagell J.R., Jr., Miller R.W., Desimone C.P., Ueland F.R., Podzielinski I., Goodrich S.T., Elder J.W., Huang B., Kryscio R.J., Pavlik E.J. Long-term survival of women with epithelial ovarian cancer detected by ultrasonographic screening. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011;118:1212–1221. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318238d030. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources