Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr 13;12(4):e0175711.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175711. eCollection 2017.

Pharmacogenetic variants in TPMT alter cellular responses to cisplatin in inner ear cell lines

Affiliations

Pharmacogenetic variants in TPMT alter cellular responses to cisplatin in inner ear cell lines

Amit P Bhavsar et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Cisplatin is a highly-effective and widely-used chemotherapeutic agent that causes ototoxicity in many patients. Pharmacogenomic studies of key genes controlling drug biotransformation identified variants in thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) as predictors of cisplatin-induced ototoxicity, although the mechanistic basis of this interaction has not been reported. Expression constructs of TPMT*3A, *3B and *3C variants were generated and monitored in cultured cells. Cellular TPMT*3A levels were detected at >20-fold lower amounts than the wild type confirming the unstable nature of this variant. The expression of wild type TPMT (TPMT*1) in two murine ear cell lines, HEI-OC1 and UB/OC-1, significantly mitigated their susceptibility to cisplatin toxicity. Cisplatin treatment induced Tlr4 gene expression in HEI-OC1 cells and this response was blunted by the expression of wild type TPMT but not TPMT*3A. In line with the significant mitigation of TPMT*1-expressing cells to cisplatin cytotoxicity, these findings demonstrate a drug-gene interaction between increased TPMT activity and decreased susceptibility to cisplatin-induced toxicity of inner ear cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Pharmacogenetic variants in TPMT show differential stability in cell culture.
Top, Representative western blot of HEK293T cells expressing indicated TPMT variants. TPMT was specifically detected using an HA-epitope tag. Bottom, quantification of West blot analysis, normalizing HA signal intensity to corresponding GAPDH signal intensity. Shown are results from two independent experiments. TPMT*3A levels are 4% of wild type TPMT levels.
Fig 2
Fig 2. TPMT variation influences cisplatin cytotoxicity in murine inner ear cell lines.
HEI-OC1 or UB/OC-1 cells expressing TPMT*1 or TPMT*3A (as indicated) were treated with varying concentrations of cisplatin, quantified by MTT assay and the best-fit IC50 values were determined using a non-linear log(inhibitor) vs. normalized response model. Dose response curves are shown in S3 Fig and curve fitting parameters are listed in S2 Table. Data are presented as the mean and standard error of the mean. * and ** denote P < 0.05 and P < 0.01, respectively using Extra sum-of-squares F test.
Fig 3
Fig 3. TPMT influences response of a cisplatin biosensor in a murine inner ear cell line.
A, Tlr4 expression was quantified in HEI-OC1 cells treated with the indicated concentrations of cisplatin. Tlr4 expression increased with increasing cisplatin and served as a cisplatin biosensor. B, HEI-OC1 cells expressing TPMT*1 or TPMT*3A were treated with 25 μM cisplatin or left untreated and relative expression of the cisplatin biosensor was determined. Data are presented as the mean and standard error of the mean for nine replicates for untreated cells (3 independent experiments) and 6 replicates for cisplatin treated cells (2 independent experiments). *, ** and ns denote P < .05, P < .01 and not significant, respectively using one-way ANOVA with Tukey post-test analyses.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Estlin EJ, Veal GJ. Clinical and cellular pharmacology in relation to solid tumours of childhood. Cancer Treat Rev. 2003;29(4):253–73. - PubMed
    1. Ho GY, Woodward N, Coward JI. Cisplatin versus carboplatin: comparative review of therapeutic management in solid malignancies. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2016;102:37–46. 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.03.014 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brock PR, Knight KR, Freyer DR, Campbell KC, Steyger PS, Blakley BW, et al. Platinum-induced ototoxicity in children: a consensus review on mechanisms, predisposition, and protection, including a new International Society of Pediatric Oncology Boston ototoxicity scale. Journal of clinical oncology: official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology. 2012;30(19):2408–17. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Langer T, am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen A, Radtke S, Meitert J, Zolk O. Understanding platinum-induced ototoxicity. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2013;34(8):458–69. 10.1016/j.tips.2013.05.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. van As JW, van den Berg H, van Dalen EC. Platinum-induced hearing loss after treatment for childhood cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;8:CD010181. - PMC - PubMed