Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr 13;15(1):29.
doi: 10.1186/s12960-017-0200-9.

Does task shifting yield cost savings and improve efficiency for health systems? A systematic review of evidence from low-income and middle-income countries

Gabriel Seidman  1 , Rifat Atun  2
Affiliations

Does task shifting yield cost savings and improve efficiency for health systems? A systematic review of evidence from low-income and middle-income countries

Gabriel Seidman et al. Hum Resour Health. .

Abstract

Background: Task shifting has become an increasingly popular way to increase access to health services, especially in low-resource settings. Research has demonstrated that task shifting, including the use of community health workers (CHWs) to deliver care, can improve population health. This systematic review investigates whether task shifting in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) results in efficiency improvements by achieving cost savings.

Methods: Using the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews, we searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and the Health Economic Evaluation Database on March 22, 2016. We included any original peer-review articles that demonstrated cost impact of a task shifting program in an LMIC.

Results: We identified 794 articles, of which 34 were included in our study. We found that substantial evidence exists for achieving cost savings and efficiency improvements from task shifting activities related to tuberculosis and HIV/AIDS, and additional evidence exists for the potential to achieve cost savings from activities related to malaria, NCDs, NTDs, childhood illness, and other disease areas, especially at the primary health care and community levels.

Conclusions: Task shifting presents a viable option for health system cost savings in LMICs. Going forward, program planners should carefully consider whether task shifting can improve population health and health systems efficiency in their countries, and researchers should investigate whether task shifting can also achieve cost savings for activities related to emerging global health priorities and health systems strengthening activities such as supply chain management or monitoring and evaluation.

Keywords: Community health workers; Cost-effectiveness; Efficiency; Health systems; Systematic review; Task shifting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study selection for inclusion in systematic review
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Grigoli F, Kapsoli J. Waste not, want not: the efficiency of health expenditure in emerging and developing economies. IMF Working Papers. 2013;(187).
    1. Hernandez-Peña P. Health worker remuneration in WHO Member States. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91(11):808–815. doi: 10.2471/BLT.13.120840. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chisholm D, Evans DB. Improving health system efficiency as a means of moving towards universal coverage, in World Health Report Background Paper. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2010.
    1. World Health Organization. First Global Conference on Task Shifting. 2008 [cited 2016 March 15]; Available from: http://www.who.int/healthsystems/task_shifting/en/.
    1. Joshi R, Alim M, Kengne AP, Jan S, Maulik PK, Peiris D, Patel AA. Task shifting for non-communicable disease management in low and middle income countries—a systematic review. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e103754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103754. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types