[A Meta analysis of the efficacy of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation for treating pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome]
- PMID: 28407831
- PMCID: PMC7389656
- DOI: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2017.04.014
[A Meta analysis of the efficacy of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional mechanical ventilation for treating pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome]
Abstract
Objective: To systematically assess the clinical efficacy of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) and conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) for treating pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
Methods: Data from randomized controlled trials comparing HFOV and CMV in the treatment of pediatric ARDS published before July 2016 were collected from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Medline, CNKI, and Wanfang Data. Literature screening, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed by two independent reviewers according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The selected studies were then subjected to a Meta analysis using the RevMan 5.3 software.
Results: A total of 6 studies involving 246 patients were included. The results of the Meta analysis showed that there were no significant differences between the HFOV and CMV groups in the in-hospital or 30-day mortality rate, incidence of barotrauma, mean ventilation time, and oxygenation index (P>0.05). However, compared with CMV, HFOV increased the PaO2/FiO2 ratio by 17%, 24%, and 31% at 24, 48, and 72 hours after treatment respectively, and improved oxygenation in patients.
Conclusions: Although the mortality rate is not reduced by HFOV in children with ARDS, this treatment can result in significant improvement in oxygenation compared with CMV. Further large-sample, multicenter, randomized clinical trials will be required to draw a definitive conclusion.
目的: 系统评价高频震荡通气(HFOV)与常频机械通气(CMV)治疗小儿急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的疗效。
方法: 计算机检索The Cochrane Library、PubMed、Medline、中国知网(CNKI)、万方(Wanfang Data)等数据库,收集关于HFOV与CMV比较治疗儿童ARDS的随机对照试验,检索时限从建库至2016年7月。由两位评价员按照纳入与排除标准独立筛选文献、提取资料并对文献质量进行评价,然后采用RevMan 5.3软件将纳入的研究进行Meta分析。
结果: 最终纳入6项试验,共246例患儿。Meta分析结果显示:HFOV和CMV两种通气方式治疗在院内病死率或30 d病死率、气压伤发生率、平均通气时间和氧合指数方面差异均无统计学意义(P > 0.05);但相较CMV,HFOV提高了PaO2/FiO2比值(治疗后24 h、48 h、72 h分别提高了17%、24%、31%),改善了患儿氧合。
结论: 与CMV相比,HFOV并没有降低ARDS患儿的病死率,但可显著改善氧合状态。最终结论尚需更多大样本、多中心、随机的临床对照研究进一步验证。
Similar articles
-
Is high-frequency oscillatory ventilation more effective and safer than conventional protective ventilation in adult acute respiratory distress syndrome patients? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Crit Care. 2014 May 30;18(3):R111. doi: 10.1186/cc13900. Crit Care. 2014. PMID: 24887179 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and adverse events of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis.Crit Care. 2014 May 20;18(3):R102. doi: 10.1186/cc13880. Crit Care. 2014. PMID: 24886674 Free PMC article.
-
The clinical effects of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in the treatment of neonatal severe meconium aspiration syndrome complicated with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome.BMC Pediatr. 2021 Dec 10;21(1):560. doi: 10.1186/s12887-021-03042-y. BMC Pediatr. 2021. PMID: 34893057 Free PMC article.
-
High-frequency oscillatory ventilation in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Pediatr Pulmonol. 2021 Jul;56(7):1872-1888. doi: 10.1002/ppul.25428. Epub 2021 Apr 26. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2021. PMID: 33902159
-
Elective high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants.Neonatology. 2013;103(1):7-8; discussion 8-9. doi: 10.1159/000338553. Epub 2012 Aug 30. Neonatology. 2013. PMID: 23037971 Review.
Cited by
-
HFOV in Pediatric ARDS: Viable or Vestigial?Indian J Pediatr. 2020 Mar;87(3):171-172. doi: 10.1007/s12098-020-03215-0. Epub 2020 Feb 5. Indian J Pediatr. 2020. PMID: 32026303 No abstract available.
-
The Current State of Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome.Pediatr Allergy Immunol Pulmonol. 2019 Jun 1;32(2):35-44. doi: 10.1089/ped.2019.0999. Epub 2019 Jun 17. Pediatr Allergy Immunol Pulmonol. 2019. PMID: 31236307 Free PMC article. Review.
-
High-frequency oscillatory ventilation: A narrative review.Can J Respir Ther. 2019 May 2;55:40-46. doi: 10.29390/cjrt-2019-004. eCollection 2019. Can J Respir Ther. 2019. PMID: 31297448 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- 喻 文亮, 陆 铸今, 王 莹, et al. 小儿急性呼吸窘迫综合征前瞻性多中心临床流行病学研究. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10246-2007069462.htm 中华急诊医学杂志. 2005;14(6):448–453.
-
- Arnold JH, Hanson JH, Toro-Figuero LO, et al. Prospective, randomized comparison of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and conventional mechanical ventilation in pediatric respiratory failure. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283394379_Prospective_randomize.... Crit Care Med. 1994;22(10):1530–1539. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources