Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Aug 30;2(2):e12.
doi: 10.2196/cancer.5947.

Comparing Web-Based Provider-Initiated and Patient-Initiated Survivorship Care Planning for Cancer Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Katherine Clegg Smith  1   2 , Elliott Tolbert  1 , Susan M Hannum  1 , Archana Radhakrishnan  3 , Kelsey Zorn  1 , Amanda Blackford  4 , Stephen Greco  5   6 , Karen Smith  2   3   7 , Claire F Snyder  2   8   9
Affiliations

Comparing Web-Based Provider-Initiated and Patient-Initiated Survivorship Care Planning for Cancer Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Katherine Clegg Smith et al. JMIR Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: Survivorship care plans (SCPs) are intended to facilitate communication and coordination between patients, oncologists, and primary care providers. Most SCP initiatives have focused on oncology providers initiating the SCP process, but time and resource barriers have limited uptake.

Objective: This trial compares the feasibility and value of 2 Web-based SCP tools: provider-initiated versus patient-initiated.

Methods: This mixed-methods study recruited clinicians from 2 academically-affiliated community oncology practices. Eligible patients were treated by a participating oncologist, had nonmetastatic cancer, completed acute treatment ≤ 2 months before enrollment, and had no evidence of disease. Patients were randomized 1:1 to either provider-initiated or patient-initiated SCPs-both are Web-based tools. We conducted qualitative interviews with providers at baseline and follow-up and with patients 2 months after enrollment. In addition, patients were administered the Preparing for Life as a (New) Survivor (PLANS) and Cancer Survivors' Unmet Needs (CaSUN) surveys at baseline and 2 months.

Results: A total of 40 providers were approached for the study, of whom 13 (33%) enrolled. Providers or clinic staff required researcher assistance to identify eligible patients; 41 patients were randomized, of whom 25 completed follow-up (61%; 13 provider-initiated, 12 patient-initiated). Of the 25, 11 (44%) had initiated the SCP; 5 (20%) provided the SCP to their primary care provider. On the Preparing for Life as a (New) Survivor and Cancer Survivors' Unmet Needs, patients in both arms tended to report high knowledge and confidence and few unmet needs. In qualitative interviews, providers and patients discussed SCPs' value.

Conclusions: Regardless of patient- versus provider-initiated templates and the Web-based design of these tools, barriers to survivorship care planning persist. Further efforts should emphasize workflow functions for identifying and completing SCPs-regardless of the SCP form used.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02405819; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02405819 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6jWqcWOvK).

Keywords: mixed methods study; randomized controlled trial; survivorship care plan.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Enrollment into survivorship care planning trial.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hewitt ME, Greenfield S, Stovall E. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: Lost in transition. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006.
    1. Kantsiper M, McDonald EL, Geller G, Shockney L, Snyder C, Wolff AC. Transitioning to breast cancer survivorship: perspectives of patients, cancer specialists, and primary care providers. J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Nov;24(Suppl 2):S459–66. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1000-2. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/19838851 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Grunfeld E, Julian JA, Pond G, Maunsell E, Coyle D, Folkes A, Joy AA, Provencher L, Rayson D, Rheaume DE, Porter GA, Paszat LF, Pritchard KI, Robidoux A, Smith S, Sussman J, Dent S, Sisler J, Wiernikowski J, Levine MN. Evaluating survivorship care plans: results of a randomized, clinical trial of patients with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Dec 20;29(36):4755–62. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.36.8373. http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=22042959 JCO.2011.36.8373 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hershman DL, Greenlee H, Awad D, Kalinsky K, Maurer M, Kranwinkel G, Brafman L, Jayasena R, Tsai W, Neugut AI, Crew KD. Randomized controlled trial of a clinic-based survivorship intervention following adjuvant therapy in breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Apr;138(3):795–806. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2486-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Parry C, Kent EE, Forsythe LP, Alfano CM, Rowland JH. Can't see the forest for the care plan: a call to revisit the context of care planning. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jul 20;31(21):2651–3. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.48.4618. http://jco.ascopubs.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=23796989 JCO.2012.48.4618 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources