Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2017 Apr 4;8(14):23099-23109.
doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15485.

The urokinase plasminogen activation system in gastroesophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

The urokinase plasminogen activation system in gastroesophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Daniel Brungs et al. Oncotarget. .

Abstract

Background: The urokinase plasminogen activation (uPA) system is a crucial pathway for tumour invasion and establishment of metastasis. Although there is good evidence that uPA system expression is a clinically relevant biomarker in some solid tumours, its role in gastroesophageal cancer is uncertain.

Results: We identified 22 studies encompassing 1966 patients which fulfilled the inclusion criteria. uPA, uPAR, or PAI-1 expression is significantly associated with high risk clinicopathological features. High uPA expression is associated with a shorter RFS (HR 1.90 95% 1.16-3.11, p = 0.01) and OS (HR 2.21 95% CI 1.74-2.80, p < 0.0001). High uPAR expression is associated with poorer OS (HR 2.21 95%CI 1.82-2.69, p < 0.0001). High PAI-1 expression is associated with shorter RFS (HR 1.96 96% CI 1.07-3.58, p = 0.03) and OS (HR 1.84 95%CI 1.28-2.64, p < 0.0001). There was no significant association between PAI-2 expression and OS (HR 0.97 95%CI 0.48-1.94, p < 0.92) although data was limited.

Materials and methods: We undertook a systematic review evaluating expression of uPA, urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1/SerpinE1) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-2 (PAI-2/SerpinB2) on primary oesophageal, gastro-oesophageal junction, and gastric adenocarcinomas. We performed a meta-analysis of clinicopathological associations, overall survival (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS).

Conclusions: We conclude that the uPA system is a clinically relevant biomarker in primary gastroesophageal cancer, with higher expression of uPA, uPAR and PAI-1 associated with higher risk disease and poorer prognosis. This also highlights the potential utility of the uPA system as a therapeutic target for improved treatment strategies.

Keywords: gastrointestinal neoplasms; stomach neoplasms; urokinase plasminogen activator; urokinase-type plasminogen activator.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

All authors declare no conflicts of interest.

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. The uPA system
Schematic representation of the urokinase plasminogen activation (uPA) system. The membrane bound urokinase receptor (uPAR) binds circulating inactive pro-uPA, facilitating the activation of pro-uPA to uPA which subsequently converts co-localised plasminogen to plasmin that can directly degrade components of the extracellular matrix (ECM) and activate pro-matrix metalloproteases (MMP) to further break down ECM. Plasminogen activator inhibitors 1 or 2 (PAI-1, PAI-2) are efficient endogenous inhibitors of uPA.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Study selection flow diagram
HR –hazard ratio; OS–overall survival; RFS–recurrence free survival.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Risk of bias summary
For each bias domain: green = “low risk” means that sufficient data was available to allow assessment of quality and fulfilled criteria for each domain, and accordingly is deemed low risk of bias. Orange = “unclear risk” means that insufficient data was presented to adequately assess the quality of the domain and accordingly the study has potentially high risk of bias. There were no studies deemed high risk of bias.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Pooled estimate of hazard ratio (HR) for uPA expression and overall survival (OS)
Pooled estimate of hazard ratio (HR) for overall survival. The square on each bar represents the HR for an individual trial, and the bar shows the 95% confidence interval (CI). The diamond represents a pooled estimate with the centre of the diamond giving the HR estimate, and the extremes of the diamond representing the 95% CI. 24.
Figure 5
Figure 5. Pooled estimate of hazard ratio (HR) for uPAR expression and overall survival (OS)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Pooled estimate of hazard ratio (HR) for PAI-1 expression and overall survival (OS)

References

    1. Garrido M, Fonseca PJ, Vieitez JM, Frunza M, Lacave AJ. Challenges in first line chemotherapy and targeted therapy in advanced gastric cancer. Expert review of anticancer therapy. 2014;14:887–900. - PubMed
    1. Ranson M, Andronicos NM. Plasminogen binding and cancer: promises and pitfalls. Frontiers in bioscience. 2003;8:s294–304. - PubMed
    1. Dass K, Ahmad A, Azmi AS, Sarkar SH, Sarkar FH. Evolving role of uPA/uPAR system in human cancers. Cancer treatment reviews. 2008;34:122–136. - PubMed
    1. Laufs S, Schumacher J, Allgayer H. Urokinase-receptor (u-PAR): an essential player in multiple games of cancer: a review on its role in tumor progression, invasion, metastasis, proliferation/dormancy, clinical outcome and minimal residual disease. Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex) 2006;5:1760–1771. - PubMed
    1. Llinas P, Le Du MH, Gardsvoll H, Dano K, Ploug M, Gilquin B, Stura EA, Menez A. Crystal structure of the human urokinase plasminogen activator receptor bound to an antagonist peptide. The EMBO journal. 2005;24:1655–1663. - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances