The urokinase plasminogen activation system in gastroesophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 28416743
- PMCID: PMC5410288
- DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.15485
The urokinase plasminogen activation system in gastroesophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: The urokinase plasminogen activation (uPA) system is a crucial pathway for tumour invasion and establishment of metastasis. Although there is good evidence that uPA system expression is a clinically relevant biomarker in some solid tumours, its role in gastroesophageal cancer is uncertain.
Results: We identified 22 studies encompassing 1966 patients which fulfilled the inclusion criteria. uPA, uPAR, or PAI-1 expression is significantly associated with high risk clinicopathological features. High uPA expression is associated with a shorter RFS (HR 1.90 95% 1.16-3.11, p = 0.01) and OS (HR 2.21 95% CI 1.74-2.80, p < 0.0001). High uPAR expression is associated with poorer OS (HR 2.21 95%CI 1.82-2.69, p < 0.0001). High PAI-1 expression is associated with shorter RFS (HR 1.96 96% CI 1.07-3.58, p = 0.03) and OS (HR 1.84 95%CI 1.28-2.64, p < 0.0001). There was no significant association between PAI-2 expression and OS (HR 0.97 95%CI 0.48-1.94, p < 0.92) although data was limited.
Materials and methods: We undertook a systematic review evaluating expression of uPA, urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1/SerpinE1) and plasminogen activator inhibitor-2 (PAI-2/SerpinB2) on primary oesophageal, gastro-oesophageal junction, and gastric adenocarcinomas. We performed a meta-analysis of clinicopathological associations, overall survival (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS).
Conclusions: We conclude that the uPA system is a clinically relevant biomarker in primary gastroesophageal cancer, with higher expression of uPA, uPAR and PAI-1 associated with higher risk disease and poorer prognosis. This also highlights the potential utility of the uPA system as a therapeutic target for improved treatment strategies.
Keywords: gastrointestinal neoplasms; stomach neoplasms; urokinase plasminogen activator; urokinase-type plasminogen activator.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors declare no conflicts of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Figures
References
-
- Garrido M, Fonseca PJ, Vieitez JM, Frunza M, Lacave AJ. Challenges in first line chemotherapy and targeted therapy in advanced gastric cancer. Expert review of anticancer therapy. 2014;14:887–900. - PubMed
-
- Ranson M, Andronicos NM. Plasminogen binding and cancer: promises and pitfalls. Frontiers in bioscience. 2003;8:s294–304. - PubMed
-
- Dass K, Ahmad A, Azmi AS, Sarkar SH, Sarkar FH. Evolving role of uPA/uPAR system in human cancers. Cancer treatment reviews. 2008;34:122–136. - PubMed
-
- Laufs S, Schumacher J, Allgayer H. Urokinase-receptor (u-PAR): an essential player in multiple games of cancer: a review on its role in tumor progression, invasion, metastasis, proliferation/dormancy, clinical outcome and minimal residual disease. Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex) 2006;5:1760–1771. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
