Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr;33(2):117-121.
doi: 10.1016/j.joa.2016.07.011. Epub 2016 Aug 12.

Trends in physiological coagulation factors in Japanese patients receiving novel oral anticoagulants

Affiliations

Trends in physiological coagulation factors in Japanese patients receiving novel oral anticoagulants

Tomoyuki Nagao et al. J Arrhythm. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Little is known about physiological anticoagulation effects via antithrombin III (AT III) and protein C/S (PC/PS) in patients using new oral anticoagulants (NOACs).

Methods: We evaluated 120 consecutive patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving NOACs. Patients were randomly divided into three groups: a dabigatran group (DG, N=40), a rivaroxaban group (RG, N=40) or an apixaban group (AG, N=40). A warfarin group (WG, N=40) was matched with NOAC groups for age, sex and type of AF during the same time period. Blood samples were obtained in pretreatment, trough and peak phases to measure the activity of physiological coagulation inhibitors, including AT III and PC/PS or thrombus formation markers such as D-dimer and thrombin-antithrombin complex (TAT).

Results: D-dimer, TAT and AT III values for the NOAC groups were equivalent in the peak and trough phases. PC/PS activity in both phases was equally maintained in the pretreatment phase in the NOAC groups, while the activity in the WG was significantly suppressed in steady state. Moreover, no differences in trends for PC/PS activity were observed among NOAC groups.

Conclusions: PC/PS activity was constant in both peak and trough phases in the patients on NOACs compared with activity of those on warfarin. In addition, there was no difference in the findings among NOACs.

Keywords: Antithrombin III; Atrial fibrillation; Novel oral anticoagulant; Protein C/S.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1
Trends in D dimer, TAT in patients for each anticoagulant group in the pretreatment, peak, and trough phase. A dotted line shows the value in the WG. DG, dabigatran group; RG, rivaroxaban group; AG, apixaban group; WG, warfarin group; TAT, thrombin–antithrombin complex.

References

    1. Wolf P.A., Abbott R.D., Kannel W.B. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the framingham study. Stroke. 1991;22:983–988. - PubMed
    1. Gage B.F., Waterman A.D., Shannon W. Validation of clinical classification schemes for predicting stroke: results from the national registry of atrial fibrillation. J Am Med Assoc. 2001;285:2864–2870. - PubMed
    1. Barnes G.D., Lucas E., Alexander G.C. National trends in ambulatory oral anticoagulant use. Am J Med. 2015;128(1300-5):e1302. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Connolly S.J., Ezekowitz M.D., Yusuf S. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1139–1151. - PubMed
    1. Patel M.R., Mahaffey K.W., Garg J. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:883–891. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources