Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr;33(2):130-133.
doi: 10.1016/j.joa.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Sep 12.

Comparison of the measured pre-ejection periods and left ventricular ejection times between echocardiography and impedance cardiography for optimizing cardiac resynchronization therapy

Affiliations

Comparison of the measured pre-ejection periods and left ventricular ejection times between echocardiography and impedance cardiography for optimizing cardiac resynchronization therapy

Kazuki Noda et al. J Arrhythm. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Background: The pre-ejection period (PEP) and left ventricular ejection time (LVET) are easily measured by impedance cardiography (ICG). We hypothesized that the PEP/LVET measured by ICG would correlate with that measured by echocardiography, and that PEP/LVET measured by ICG would be useful for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) optimization.

Methods: Newly CRT implanted patients were optimized by echocardiography. The PEP/LVET was measured by echocardiography and ICG in two different settings: optimized setting and right ventricle (RV)-only pacing.

Results: The PEP/LVET was significantly decreased in the optimized setting compared with that in RV-only pacing (0.62±0.13 vs 0.75±0.16, p<0.05). The PEP/LVET values calculated by ICG and echocardiography were positively correlated (r=0.553, p=0.003).

Conclusion: ICG was useful for the optimization of CRT.

Keywords: Cardiac resynchronization therapy; Echocardiogram; Impedance cardiography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
(A) AoVTIs and PEP/LVETs measured by UCG were tended to correlate negatively (r=−0.368, p=0.059). (B) There was a positive correlation between PEP/LVETs measured by ICG and those measured by Ultrasonic Cardiography (UCG) (r=0.553, p=0.003). Data are expressed as mean±SD. *p<0.05 vs. PEP/LVETs measured by ICG. Abbreviations: AoVTI, velocity-time integral of aortic flow; ICG, impedance cardiography; LVET, left ventricular ejection time; PEP, pre-ejection period.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
(A) PEP/LVETs measured by impedance cardiography were decreased in the optimized setting (0.62±0.13) compared with those in RV-only pacing (0.74±0.16). The AV delay and heart rate were comparable between the optimized setting and RV-only pacing (n=27). (B) PEP/LVETs measured by echocardiogram were decreased in the optimized setting (0.60±0.1) compared with those in RV-only pacing (0.74±0.2) (n=27). Data are expressed as mean±SD. *p<0.05 vs. optimize setting. Abbreviations: AV atrio-ventricular; ICG, impedance cardiography; LVET, left ventricular ejection time; PEP, pre-ejection period; RV, right ventricle.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Komajda M. Current challenges in the management of heart failure. Circ J. 2015;79:948–953. - PubMed
    1. Cleland J.G., Daubert J.C., Erdmann E. The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1539–1549. - PubMed
    1. Moss A.J., Hall W.J., Cannom D.S. Cardiac-resynchronization therapy for the prevention of heart-failure events. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1329–1338. - PubMed
    1. Kosmala W., Marwick T.H. Meta-analysis of effects of optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy on left ventricular function, exercise capacity, and quality of life in patients with heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 2014;113:988–994. - PubMed
    1. Chung E.S., Leon A.R., Tavazzi L. Results of the predictors of response to CRT (PROSPECT) trial. Circulation. 2008;117:2608–2616. - PubMed