Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr 4:11:157.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00157. eCollection 2017.

Multi-modal, Multi-measure, and Multi-class Discrimination of ADHD with Hierarchical Feature Extraction and Extreme Learning Machine Using Structural and Functional Brain MRI

Affiliations

Multi-modal, Multi-measure, and Multi-class Discrimination of ADHD with Hierarchical Feature Extraction and Extreme Learning Machine Using Structural and Functional Brain MRI

Muhammad Naveed Iqbal Qureshi et al. Front Hum Neurosci. .

Erratum in

Abstract

Structural and functional MRI unveil many hidden properties of the human brain. We performed this multi-class classification study on selected subjects from the publically available attention deficit hyperactivity disorder ADHD-200 dataset of patients and healthy children. The dataset has three groups, namely, ADHD inattentive, ADHD combined, and typically developing. We calculated the global averaged functional connectivity maps across the whole cortex to extract anatomical atlas parcellation based features from the resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) data and cortical parcellation based features from the structural MRI (sMRI) data. In addition, the preprocessed image volumes from both of these modalities followed an ANOVA analysis separately using all the voxels. This study utilized the average measure from the most significant regions acquired from ANOVA as features for classification in addition to the multi-modal and multi-measure features of structural and functional MRI data. We extracted most discriminative features by hierarchical sparse feature elimination and selection algorithm. These features include cortical thickness, image intensity, volume, cortical thickness standard deviation, surface area, and ANOVA based features respectively. An extreme learning machine performed both the binary and multi-class classifications in comparison with support vector machines. This article reports prediction accuracy of both unimodal and multi-modal features from test data. We achieved 76.190% (p < 0.0001) classification accuracy in multi-class settings as well as 92.857% (p < 0.0001) classification accuracy in binary settings. In addition, we found ANOVA-based significant regions of the brain that also play a vital role in the classification of ADHD. Thus, from a clinical perspective, this multi-modal group analysis approach with multi-measure features may improve the accuracy of the ADHD differential diagnosis.

Keywords: ADHD-200; ANOVA; extreme learning machine; global functional connectivity; hierarchical feature extraction; machine learning; neuroimaging; revised recursive feature elimination.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A typical global functional connectivity map for a single ADHD patient. The left column shows the axial view; middle column shows the sagittal while the rightmost column shows the coronal view. The color temperature in the connectivity maps represents the strength of the connectivity measure between different resting-state networks in the cortical region.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overall classification framework of the current study. The box at the extreme left presents the feature acquisition. Right, top four boxes represent the feature selection and training of the classifier. The box at the bottom on the extreme right shows the framework to acquire the testing accuracy from the data.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Twelve regions with significant differences as determined by structural ANOVA. The top row shows the transverse views. The bottom figures show the lateral views. The most significant results are located in the superior frontal gyrus.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Four significant networks including nine significant sub-network regions acquired by ANOVA analysis of the global connectivity maps of resting state fMRI data. The figure depicts the selected region in all three sagittal, coronal, and axial views respectively.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aboitiz F., Ossandón T., Zamorano F., Palma B., Carrasco X. (2014). Irrelevant stimulus processing in ADHD: catecholamine dynamics and attentional networks. Front. Psychol. 5:183. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00183 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Arbabshirani M. R., Plis S., Sui J., Calhoun V. D. (2017). Single subject prediction of brain disorders in neuroimaging: promises and pitfalls. Neuroimage 145(Part B), 137–165. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.079 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Association AP (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Washington, DC: APA.
    1. Biswal B. B., Mennes M., Zuo X.-N., Gohel S., Kelly C., Smith S. M., et al. . (2010). Toward discovery science of human brain function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 4734–4739. 10.1073/pnas.0911855107 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Castellanos F. X., Tannock R. (2002). Neuroscience of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: the search for endophenotypes. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3, 617–628. 10.1038/nrn896 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources