Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017:2017:4975091.
doi: 10.1155/2017/4975091. Epub 2017 Mar 22.

A Framework for Describing the Influence of Service Organisation and Delivery on Participation in Fetal Anomaly Screening in England

Affiliations

A Framework for Describing the Influence of Service Organisation and Delivery on Participation in Fetal Anomaly Screening in England

Hyacinth O Ukuhor et al. J Pregnancy. 2017.

Abstract

Objective. The aim of this research was to explore the influence of service organisation and delivery on providers and users' interactions and decision-making in the context of Down's syndrome screening. Methods. A qualitative descriptive study involving online interviews conducted with a purposive sample of 34 community midwives, 35 pregnant women, and 15 partners from two maternity services in different health districts in England. Data were analysed using a combination of grounded theory principles and content analysis and a framework was developed. Results. The main emerging concepts were organisational constraints, power, routinisation, and tensions. Providers were concerned about being time-limited that encouraged routine, minimal information-giving and lacked skills to check users' understanding. Users reported their participation was influenced by providers' attitudes, the ambience of the environment, asymmetric power relations, and the offer and perception of screening as a routine test. Discordance between the national programme's policy of nondirective informed choice and providers' actions of recommending and arranging screening appointments was unexpected. Additionally, providers and users differing perceptions of emotional effects of information, beliefs, and expectations created tensions within them, between them, and in the antenatal environment. Conclusions. A move towards a social model of care may be beneficial to empower service users and create less tension for providers and users.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Donabedian healthcare organisation and delivery model [51].
Figure 2
Figure 2
A conceptual framework showing participants' perceptions of the influence of service delivery on participation in antenatal Down's syndrome screening.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. NHS FASP. Fetal Anomaly Screening Programme: Consent Standard and Guidance. 2011. http://fetalanomaly.screening.nhs.uk/standardsandpolicies.
    1. NICE. Antenatal care: Routine care for the healthy pregnant woman. Full guideline. National Institute for Health and Clinical Evidence. 2008, http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/index.jsp?action=byID&o=11947.
    1. Frosch D. L., May S. G., Rendle K. A. S., Tietbohl C., Elwyn G. Authoritarian physicians and patients' fear of being labeled “difficult” among key obstacles to shared decision making. Health Affairs. 2012;31(5):1030–1038. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0576. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pilnick A. “It's something for you both to think about”: choice and decision making in nuchal translucency screening for Down's syndrome. Sociology of Health and Illness. 2008;30(4):511–530. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9566.2007.01071.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pilnick A. ‘It's just one of the best tests that we've got at the moment’: the presentation of nuchal translucency screening for fetal abnormality in pregnancy. Discourse & Society. 2004;15(4):451–465. doi: 10.1177/0957926504043710. - DOI

MeSH terms