Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun;117(6):1141-1153.
doi: 10.1007/s00421-017-3601-5. Epub 2017 Apr 18.

No association between hand and foot temperature responses during local cold stress and rewarming

Affiliations

No association between hand and foot temperature responses during local cold stress and rewarming

Lena Norrbrand et al. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose was to examine whether associations exist between temperature responses in the fingers vs. toes and hand vs. foot during local cold-water immersion and rewarming phases.

Methods: Seventy healthy subjects (58 males, 12 females) immersed their right hand or right foot, respectively, in 8 °C water for 30 min (CWI phase), followed by a 15-min spontaneous rewarming (RW) in 25 °C air temperature.

Results: Temperature was lower in the toes than the fingers during the baseline phase (27.8 ± 3.0 vs. 33.9 ± 2.5 °C, p < 0.001), parts of the CWI phase (min 20-30: 8.8 ± 0.7 vs. 9.7 ± 1.4 °C, p < 0.001), and during the RW phase (peak temperature: 22.5 ± 5.1 vs. 32.7 ± 3.6 °C, p < 0.001). Cold-induced vasodilatation (CIVD) was more common in the fingers than in the toes (p < 0.001). Within the first 10 min of CWI, 61% of the subjects exhibited a CIVD response in the fingers, while only 6% of the subjects had a CIVD response in the toes. There was a large variability of temperature responses both within and between extremities, and there was a weak correlation between finger- and toe temperature both during the CWI (r = 0.21, p = 0.08) and the RW phases (r = 0.26, p = 0.03).

Conclusions: Results suggest that there is generally a lower temperature in the toes than the fingers after a short time of local cold exposure and that the thermal responses of the fingers/hands are not readily transferable to the toes/foot.

Keywords: CIVD; Cold tolerance; Finger; Local cold injury; Rewarming; Toe; Water immersion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors state that there is no personal or financial conflict of interest in the present study.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Average temperature (Tavg) of (a) the distal phalanx of the volar side of all fingers and toes and (b) the dorsal metacarpal and metatarsal region of the right hand and foot, respectively, obtained during the cold-water immersion test. Values are mean ± SD. Data are averaged every 30 s
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Thermography results showing average temperature (T avg) of (a) the volar and (b) the dorsal side of the distal phalanx of the fingers and toes, (c) the total area of palm and sole, and (d) the total dorsal metacarpal/metatarsal area of the right hand and foot during the spontaneous rewarming phase. Values are mean ± SD. n = 69. *Significant difference between hand and foot (p < 0.001). B: a 5-min baseline phase, WWI: a 5-min warm-water immersion phase, RW: a 15-min rewarming phase
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Representative infrared-thermal images from a single subject during the baseline and the 15-min rewarming response of (a) the hand and (b) the foot. Color coding of temperatures are indicated on the right-hand side; the brighter colors represent a warmer limb (yellow), and the darker colors represent a colder limb (dark purple). Note (1) the rate of rewarming in the hand vs. the foot and (2) the distal to proximal rewarming pattern for the fingers
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Pearson’s product-moment correlation between the average temperature (T avg) during the 5-min baseline and the 30-min cold-water immersion phase (upper graphs), and the 5-min baseline and the 15-min spontaneous rewarming phase (middle graphs), and the 30-min cold-water immersion phase and the 15-min spontaneous rewarming phase (lower graphs) in (a) all fingers of the right hand and (b) all toes of the right foot
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Pearson’s product-moment correlation between the average temperature (T avg) of all fingers of the right hand and all toes of the right foot during (a) the 30-min cold-water immersion phase and (b) the 15-min spontaneous rewarming phase
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Changes from the warm-water immersion (WWI) phase in the average temperature (T avg) of the non-immersed finger II and toe II during the hand and foot cold-water immersion test, respectively. Values are mean ± SD. # Significant difference from the previous timepoint (p ≤ 0.05)
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Changes from the warm-water immersion (WWI) phase in systolic (SAP) and diastolic (DAP) arterial pressure, and heart rate (HR) during the hand and foot cold-water immersion test, respectively. Values are mean ± SD. *Significant difference between hand and foot test (p < 0.05) #Significant difference in arterial pressure from the previous phase (p < 0.05)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ahle NW, Buroni JR, Sharp MW, Hamlet MP. Infrared thermographic measurement of circulatory compromise in trenchfoot-injured Argentine soldiers. Aviat Space Environ Med. 1990;61(3):247–250. - PubMed
    1. Amon M (2009) Effect of “sleep high-train low” hypoxic training on cold induced vasodilatation (CIVD) response in fingers and toes. Jozef Stefan International Postgraduate School, Ljubljana, Slovenia
    1. Barcroft H, Edholm OG. The effect of temperature on blood flow and deep temperature in the human forearm. J Physiol. 1943;102(1):5–20. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.1943.sp004009. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brändström H, Grip H, Hallberg P, Gronlund C, Angquist KA, Giesbrecht GG. Hand cold recovery responses before and after 15 months of military training in a cold climate. Aviat Space Environ Med. 2008;79(9):904–908. doi: 10.3357/ASEM.1886.2008. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen F, Liu ZY, Holmer I. Hand and finger skin temperatures in convective and contact cold exposure. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1996;72(4):372–379. doi: 10.1007/BF00599699. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources