Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun;48(2):179-200.
doi: 10.1111/sifp.12021. Epub 2017 Apr 19.

Barriers and Facilitators to Integrating Health Service Responses to Intimate Partner Violence in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Comparative Health Systems and Service Analysis

Barriers and Facilitators to Integrating Health Service Responses to Intimate Partner Violence in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Comparative Health Systems and Service Analysis

Manuela Colombini et al. Stud Fam Plann. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

This systematic review synthesizes 11 studies of health-sector responses to intimate partner violence (IPV) in low- and middle-income countries. The services that were most comprehensive and integrated in their responsiveness to IPV were primarily in primary health and antenatal care settings. Findings suggest that the following facilitators are important: availability of clear guidelines, policies, or protocols; management support; intersectoral coordination with clear, accessible on-site and off-site referral options; adequate and trained staff with accepting and empathetic attitudes toward survivors of IPV; initial and ongoing training for health workers; and a supportive and supervised environment in which to enact new IPV protocols. A key characteristic of the most integrated responses was the connection or "linkages" between different individual factors. Irrespective of their service entry point, what emerged as crucial was a connected systems-level response, with all elements implemented in a coordinated manner.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Literature search results

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abramsky, T. et al. 2011. “What factors are associated with recent intimate partner violence? Findings from the WHO multi‐country study on women's health and domestic violence,” BMC Public Health 11(1): 109. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson, J.C. , Campbell J.C., and Farley J.E.. 2013. “Interventions to address HIV and intimate partner violence in Sub‐Saharan Africa: A review of the literature,” Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care 24(4): 383–390. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bair‐Merritt, M.H. et al. 2014. “Primary care–based interventions for intimate partner violence: A systematic review,” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 46(2): 188–194. - PubMed
    1. Bhate‐Deosthali, P. , Ravindran S., and Vindhya U.. 2012. “Addressing domestic violence within health settings: The Dilaasa Model,” Economic and Political Weekly 47: 66–75.
    1. Bott, S. et al. 2010. “Improving the Health Sector Response to Gender Based Violence: A Resource Manual for Health Care Professionals in Developing Countries.” International Planned Parenthood Federation.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources