Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2017 Dec 15;42(24):E1437-E1445.
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002202.

Anterior Versus Posterior Thoracic Discectomy: A Systematic Review

Eoghan T Hurley  1   2 , Andrew B Maye  2 , Marcus Timlin  1 , Frank G Lyons  1   3
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Anterior Versus Posterior Thoracic Discectomy: A Systematic Review

Eoghan T Hurley et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). .

Abstract

Study design: Systematic literature review.

Objective: The aim of this study was to systematically review the current evidence in the literature on thoracic discectomies, to compare the clinical outcomes, and to determine whether there is evidence to support the use of either the anterior or posterior approach.

Summary of background data: Thoracic disc herniations (TDHs) often present with myelopathy, radiculopathy, or a combination of both. The posterior approach for thoracic discectomy has been associated with a lower complication rate, but no systematic review exists comparing the clinical outcomes.

Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library databases were searched in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines for studies performing an anterior or posterior thoracic discectomy. The methodological quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies checklist. The reported clinical outcomes were evaluated using risk ratio, with a P < 0.05 being considered statistically significant.

Results: Thirty-seven clinical studies with 1156 patients with 1300 TDHs were included in this review. There was no statistically significant difference in the total neurological improvement or neurological worsening using either an anterior approach or a posterior approach (P = 0.02812 and P = 0.5232, respectively). However, there was a statistically significant higher rate of total complications in the anterior approach (P = 0.0024).

Conclusion: The anterior approach and posterior approach have been shown to be very similar in terms of neurological outcomes. Although the posterior approach was shown to have a lower rate of total complications, this was largely because of a decrease in minor respiratory complications seen in the anterior approach. The optimal approach may therefore be based on surgeon preference as well as patient factors, specifically cardiorespiratory with American Society of Anaesthesiologists grading.

Level of evidence: 4.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bransford R, Zhang F, Bellabarba C, et al. Early experience treating thoracic disc herniations using a modified transfacet pedicle-sparing decompression and fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 2010; 12:221–231.
    1. Stillerman CB, Chen TC, Couldwell WT. Benzel EC, Stillerman CB, et al. Transfacet pedicle-sparing approach. The Thoracic Spine. St. Louis: Quality Medical; 1999. 338–345.
    1. Wood KB, Blair JM, Aepple DM, et al. The natural history of asymptomatic thoracic disc herniations. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997; 22:525–529.
    1. Gille O, Soderlund C, Razafimahandri HJ, et al. Analysis of hard thoracic herniated discs: review of 18 cases operated by thoracoscopy. Eur Spine J 2006; 15:537–542.
    1. Arts MP, Bartels RH. Anterior or posterior approach of thoracic disc herniation? A comparative cohort of mini-transthoracic versus transpedicular discectomies. Spine J 2014; 14:1654–1662.