Comparison of the ETView Single Lumen and Macintosh laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation in an airway manikin with immobilized cervical spine by novice paramedics: A randomized crossover manikin trial
- PMID: 28422820
- PMCID: PMC5406036
- DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005873
Comparison of the ETView Single Lumen and Macintosh laryngoscopes for endotracheal intubation in an airway manikin with immobilized cervical spine by novice paramedics: A randomized crossover manikin trial
Abstract
Context: Management of the airway of a trauma victim is considered challenging. Various approaches have been described to achieve airway control in this setup; many of them include video-assited viewing of the larynx during intubation. ETView Single Lumen (SL) is a novice single-use endotracheal tube equiped with a video camera and a light source at its distal tip. Its use was previously described in seeral clinical and training setups.
Objective: The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of the VivaSight SL compared with classic direct laryngoscopy performed with a Macintosh blade in a manikin-simulated trauma setup presenting various degrees of airway challenge when performed by inexperienced physicians.
Design, setting, participants: This was prospective, randomized, crossover, manikin trial. After short training on the ETView system, 67 novice paramedics attempted to perform oral intubation using both standard direct laryngoscopy (MAC group) and the VivaSight SL endotracheal tube (ETView group) in a randomized order on manikins in 3 increasingly more difficult scenarios (simple intubation, cervical spine manual stabilization, and with cervical collar in place).
Outcome measure: Overall success rate, time to intubation, number of intubation attempts, laryngeal view grade, dental compression, and overall participant satisfaction were monitored.
Results: Duration of intubation and number of attempts were significantly superior in the ETView group in the latter 2 more challenging scenarios. All other parameters showed superiority to the ETView group in all 3 scenarios.
Conclusion: The VivaSight SL system performed better in a complex scenario of airway management of a trauma victim in need for cervical spine stabilization performed by novice caregivers compared to standard direct laryngoscopy and should be considered in this clinical setup.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
ET-View compared to direct laryngoscopy in patients with immobilized cervical spine by unexperienced physicians: A randomized crossover manikin trial.Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2017;49(4):274-282. doi: 10.5603/AIT.a2017.0047. Epub 2017 Sep 27. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2017. PMID: 28953308 Clinical Trial.
-
Can the ETView VivaSight SL Rival Conventional Intubation Using the Macintosh Laryngoscope During Adult Resuscitation by Novice Physicians?: A Randomized Crossover Manikin Study.Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 May;94(21):e850. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000850. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015. PMID: 26020389 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
A comparison of McGrath MAC® and standard direct laryngoscopy in simulated immobilized cervical spine pediatric intubation: a manikin study.Eur J Pediatr. 2017 Jun;176(6):779-786. doi: 10.1007/s00431-017-2909-9. Epub 2017 Apr 21. Eur J Pediatr. 2017. PMID: 28429117 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
ETView VivaSight single lumen vs. conventional intubation in simulated studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Int Med Res. 2020 Jun;48(6):300060520925653. doi: 10.1177/0300060520925653. J Int Med Res. 2020. PMID: 32588689 Free PMC article.
-
Laryngoscopes for difficult airway scenarios: a comparison of the available devices.Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018 Sep;15(9):631-643. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2018.1511423. Epub 2018 Aug 30. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2018. PMID: 30099914 Review.
Cited by
-
Intubation with channeled versus non-channeled video laryngoscopes in simulated difficult airway by junior doctors in an out-of-hospital setting: A crossover manikin study.PLoS One. 2019 Oct 22;14(10):e0224017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224017. eCollection 2019. PLoS One. 2019. PMID: 31639167 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Different Intubation Methods in Difficult Airways during Simulated Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation with Continuous Chest Compression: A Randomized Cross-Over Manikin Trial.Emerg Med Int. 2019 Aug 20;2019:7306204. doi: 10.1155/2019/7306204. eCollection 2019. Emerg Med Int. 2019. PMID: 31531242 Free PMC article.
-
ETView SL versus Macintosh Direct Laryngoscope for Endotracheal Intubation Amid Simulated COVID-19 Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Crossover Study.J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 2;12(15):5074. doi: 10.3390/jcm12155074. J Clin Med. 2023. PMID: 37568476 Free PMC article.
-
Randomized crossover trial comparing cervical spine motion during tracheal intubation with a Macintosh laryngoscope versus a C-MAC D-blade videolaryngoscope in a simulated immobilized cervical spine.BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Aug 15;20(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01118-3. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020. PMID: 32799791 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Clinical value of video-assisted single-lumen endotracheal intubation and application of artificial intelligence in it.Am J Transl Res. 2022 Nov 15;14(11):7643-7652. eCollection 2022. Am J Transl Res. 2022. PMID: 36505300 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Thoeni N, Piegeler T, Brueesch M, et al. Incidence of difficult airway situations during prehospital airway management by emergency physicians–a retrospective analysis of 692 consecutive patients. Resuscitation 2015;90:42–5. - PubMed
-
- Piegeler T, Neth P, Schlaepfer M, et al. Advanced airway management in an anaesthesiologist-staffed Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS): A retrospective analysis of 1047 out-of-hospital intubations. Resuscitation 2016;105:66–9. - PubMed
-
- Michailidou M, O’Keeffe T, Mosier JM, et al. A comparison of video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for the emergency intubation of trauma patients. World J Surg 2015;39:782–8. - PubMed
-
- Szarpak Ł, Truszewski Z, Smereka J, et al. Are paramedics able to perform endotracheal intubation with access to the patient through the back seat of the car? Randomized crossover manikin study. Am J Emerg Med 2016;34:1161–3. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources