Multilevel cervical disc replacement versus multilevel anterior discectomy and fusion: A meta-analysis
- PMID: 28422837
- PMCID: PMC5406053
- DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006503
Multilevel cervical disc replacement versus multilevel anterior discectomy and fusion: A meta-analysis
Abstract
Background: Cervical disc replacement (CDR) has been developed as an alternative surgical procedure to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of single-level cervical degenerative disc disease. However, patients with multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease (MCDDD) are common in our clinic. Multilevel CDR is less established compared with multilevel ACDF. This study aims to compare the outcomes and evaluate safety and efficacy of CDR versus ACDF for the treatment of MCDDD.
Methods: A meta-analysis was performed for articles published up until August 2016. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective comparative studies associated with the use of CDR versus ACDF for the treatment of MCDDD were included in the current study. Two reviewers independently screened the articles and data following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement.
Results: Seven studies with 702 enrolled patients suffering from MCDDD were retrieved. Patients who underwent CDR had similar operative times, blood loss, Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores compared to patients who underwent ACDF. Patients who underwent CDR had greater overall motion of the cervical spine and the operated levels than patients who underwent ACDF. Patients who underwent CDR also had lower rates of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). The rate of adverse events was significantly lower in the CDR group.
Conclusion: CDR may be a safe and effective surgical strategy for the treatment of MCDDD. However, there is insufficient evidence to draw a strong conclusion due to relatively low-quality evidence. Future long-term, multicenter, randomized, and controlled studies are needed to validate the safety and efficacy of multilevel CDR.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures












Similar articles
-
Two-level total disc replacement with Mobi-C cervical artificial disc versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a prospective, randomized, controlled multicenter clinical trial with 4-year follow-up results.J Neurosurg Spine. 2015 Jan;22(1):15-25. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.SPINE13953. J Neurosurg Spine. 2015. PMID: 25380538 Clinical Trial.
-
Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for two contiguous levels cervical disc degenerative disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Eur Spine J. 2017 Apr;26(4):985-997. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4655-5. Epub 2016 Jun 17. Eur Spine J. 2017. PMID: 27314663 Review.
-
Mid-Term to Long-Term Outcomes After Total Cervical Disk Arthroplasty Compared With Anterior Diskectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Clin Spine Surg. 2020 Jun;33(5):192-200. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000929. Clin Spine Surg. 2020. PMID: 32271175
-
The safety and efficacy of hybrid surgery for multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion or cervical disc arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Feb;162(2):289-303. doi: 10.1007/s00701-019-04129-3. Epub 2019 Dec 17. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020. PMID: 31848789
-
Cost-effectiveness analysis: comparing single-level cervical disc replacement and single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical article.J Neurosurg Spine. 2013 Nov;19(5):546-54. doi: 10.3171/2013.8.SPINE12623. Epub 2013 Sep 6. J Neurosurg Spine. 2013. PMID: 24010896
Cited by
-
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty vs Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion at 10 Years: Results From a Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial at 3 Sites.Int J Spine Surg. 2023 Apr;17(2):230-240. doi: 10.14444/8431. Epub 2023 Apr 6. Int J Spine Surg. 2023. PMID: 37028803 Free PMC article.
-
Multilevel Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: Long-Term Outcomes at 3 and 4 Levels.Int J Spine Surg. 2020 Aug;14(s2):S41-S49. doi: 10.14444/7090. Int J Spine Surg. 2020. PMID: 32994305 Free PMC article.
-
Motion analysis of dynamic cervical implant stabilization versus anterior discectomy and fusion: a retrospective analysis of 70 cases.Eur Spine J. 2018 Nov;27(11):2772-2780. doi: 10.1007/s00586-018-5755-1. Epub 2018 Sep 7. Eur Spine J. 2018. PMID: 30194530
-
Clinical outcomes for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with silicon nitride spine cages: a multicenter study.J Spine Surg. 2019 Dec;5(4):504-519. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.11.17. J Spine Surg. 2019. PMID: 32043001 Free PMC article.
-
One-Level Versus 2-Level Treatment With Cervical Disc Arthroplasty or Fusion: Outcomes Up to 7 Years.Int J Spine Surg. 2019 Dec 31;13(6):551-560. doi: 10.14444/6076. eCollection 2019 Dec. Int J Spine Surg. 2019. PMID: 31970051 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH, et al. Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27:2431–4. - PubMed
-
- Sasso WR, Smucker JD, Sasso MP, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2017;42:209–16. - PubMed
-
- Radcliff K, Lerner J, Yang C, et al. Seven-year cost-effectiveness of ProDisc-C total disc replacement: results from investigational device exemption and post-approval studies. J Neurosurg Spine 2016;24:760–8. - PubMed
-
- Loumeau TP, Darden BV, Kesman TJ, et al. A RCT comparing 7-year clinical outcomes of one level symptomatic cervical disc disease (SCDD) following ProDisc-C total disc arthroplasty (TDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Eur Spine J 2016;25:2263–70. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical