Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Apr;96(16):e6503.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000006503.

Multilevel cervical disc replacement versus multilevel anterior discectomy and fusion: A meta-analysis

Affiliations
Review

Multilevel cervical disc replacement versus multilevel anterior discectomy and fusion: A meta-analysis

Ting-Kui Wu et al. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Cervical disc replacement (CDR) has been developed as an alternative surgical procedure to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of single-level cervical degenerative disc disease. However, patients with multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease (MCDDD) are common in our clinic. Multilevel CDR is less established compared with multilevel ACDF. This study aims to compare the outcomes and evaluate safety and efficacy of CDR versus ACDF for the treatment of MCDDD.

Methods: A meta-analysis was performed for articles published up until August 2016. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective comparative studies associated with the use of CDR versus ACDF for the treatment of MCDDD were included in the current study. Two reviewers independently screened the articles and data following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement.

Results: Seven studies with 702 enrolled patients suffering from MCDDD were retrieved. Patients who underwent CDR had similar operative times, blood loss, Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores compared to patients who underwent ACDF. Patients who underwent CDR had greater overall motion of the cervical spine and the operated levels than patients who underwent ACDF. Patients who underwent CDR also had lower rates of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). The rate of adverse events was significantly lower in the CDR group.

Conclusion: CDR may be a safe and effective surgical strategy for the treatment of MCDDD. However, there is insufficient evidence to draw a strong conclusion due to relatively low-quality evidence. Future long-term, multicenter, randomized, and controlled studies are needed to validate the safety and efficacy of multilevel CDR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart of article selection process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Risk of bias of the randomized controlled trials, +: low risk bias; ?: unclear risk bias; and −: high risk bias.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Surgery time. Forest plot of surgery time for CDR and ACDF. ACDF = anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, CDR = cervical disc replacement, CI = confidence interval, IV = inverse variance, SD = standard deviation.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Blood loss. Forest plot of blood loss for CDR and ACDF. ACDF = anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, CDR = cervical disc replacement, CI = confidence interval, IV = inverse variance, SD = standard deviation.
Figure 5
Figure 5
NDI. Forest plot of NDI for CDR and ACDF. ACDF = anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, CDR = cervical disc replacement, CI = confidence interval, IV = inverse variance, NDI Neck Disability Index, SD = standard deviation.
Figure 6
Figure 6
VAS. Forest plot of VAS for CDR and ACDF. ACDF = anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, CDR = cervical disc replacement, CI = confidence interval, IV = inverse variance, SD = standard deviation, VAS = Visual Analog Scale.
Figure 7
Figure 7
ROM of overall cervical spine. Forest plot of ROM of overall cervical spine for CDR and ACDF. ACDF = anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, CDR = cervical disc replacement, CI = confidence interval, IV = inverse variance, ROM = range of motion, SD = standard deviation.
Figure 8
Figure 8
ROM at the operated level. Forest plot of ROM at operated level for CDR and ACDF. ACDF = anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, CDR = cervical disc replacement, CI = confidence interval, IV = inverse variance, ROM = range of motion, SD = standard deviation.
Figure 9
Figure 9
ASD. Forest plot of ASD for CDR and ACDF. ACDF = anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, ASD = adjacent segment degeneration, CDR = cervical disc replacement, CI = confidence interval, M-H = Mantel–Haenszel.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Adverse events. Forest plot of adverse events for CDR and ACDF. ACDF = anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, CDR = cervical disc replacement, CI = confidence interval, M-H = Mantel–Haenszel.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Dysphagia. Forest plot of dysphagia for CDR and ACDF. ACDF = anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, CDR = cervical disc replacement, CI = confidence interval, M-H = Mantel–Haenszel.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Device-related adverse event. Forest plot of device-related adverse event for CDR and ACDF. ACDF = anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, CDR = cervical disc replacement, CI = confidence interval, M-H = Mantel–Haenszel.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Eck JC, Humphreys SC, Lim TH, et al. Biomechanical study on the effect of cervical spine fusion on adjacent-level intradiscal pressure and segmental motion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27:2431–4. - PubMed
    1. Barrey C, Campana S, Persohn S, et al. Cervical disc prosthesis versus arthrodesis using one-level, hybrid and two-level constructs: an in vitro investigation. Eur Spine J 2012;21:432–42. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sasso WR, Smucker JD, Sasso MP, et al. Long-term clinical outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2017;42:209–16. - PubMed
    1. Radcliff K, Lerner J, Yang C, et al. Seven-year cost-effectiveness of ProDisc-C total disc replacement: results from investigational device exemption and post-approval studies. J Neurosurg Spine 2016;24:760–8. - PubMed
    1. Loumeau TP, Darden BV, Kesman TJ, et al. A RCT comparing 7-year clinical outcomes of one level symptomatic cervical disc disease (SCDD) following ProDisc-C total disc arthroplasty (TDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Eur Spine J 2016;25:2263–70. - PubMed

MeSH terms