Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jan-Feb;32(1):43-48.
doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2016-0065.

Totally Percutaneous Access Using Perclose Proglide for Endovascular Treatment of Aortic Diseases

Affiliations

Totally Percutaneous Access Using Perclose Proglide for Endovascular Treatment of Aortic Diseases

Eduardo Keller Saadi et al. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Jan-Feb.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate our experience following the introduction of a percutaneous program for endovascular treatment of aortic diseases using Perclose Proglide® assessing efficacy, complications and identification of potential risk factors that could predict failure or major access site complications.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study during a two-year period was performed. All the patients submitted to totally percutaneous endovascular repair (PEVAR) of aortic diseases and transcatheter aortic valve implantation since we started the total percutaneous approach with the preclosure technique from November 2013 to December 2015 were included in the study. The primary endpoint was major ipsilateral access complication, defined according to PEVAR trial.

Results: In a cohort of 123 patients, immediate technical success was obtained in 121 (98.37%) patients, with only two (0.82%) cases in 242 vascular access sites that required intervention immediately after the procedure. Pairwise comparisons revealed increased major access complication among patients with >50% common femoral artery (CFA) calcification vs. none (P=0.004) and > 50% CFA calcification vs. < 50% CFA calcification (P=0.002). Small artery diameter (<6.5 mm) also increased major access complication compared to bigger diameters (> 6.5 mm) (P=0.027).

Conclusion: The preclosure technique with two Perclose Proglide® for PEVAR is safe and effective. Complications occur more often in patients with unfavorable access site anatomy and the success rate can be improved with proper patient selection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No conflict of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Patel MR, Jneid H, Derdeyn CP, Klein LW, Levine GN, Lookstein RA, et al. American Heart Association Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology. Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention. Council on Peripheral Vascular Disease. Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia.and Stroke Council Arteriotomy closure devices for cardiovascular procedures a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;122(18):1882–1893. - PubMed
    1. Haas PC, Krajcer Z, Diethrich EB. Closure of large percutaneous access sites using the Prostar XL Percutaneous Vascular Surgery device. J Endovasc Surg. 1999;6(2):168–170. - PubMed
    1. Nelson PR, Kracjer Z, Kansal N, Rao V, Bianchi C, Hashemi H, et al. A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of totally percutaneous access versus open femoral exposure for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (the PEVAR trial) J Vasc Surg. 2014;59(5):1181–1193. - PubMed
    1. Buck DB, Karthaus EG, Soden PA, Ultee KH, van Herwaarden JA, Moll FL, et al. Percutaneous versus femoral cutdown access for endovascular aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2015;62(1):16–21. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Petronelli S, Zurlo MT, Giambersio S, Danieli L, Occhipinti M. A single-centre experience of 200 consecutive unselected patients in percutaneous EVAR. Radiol Med. 2014;119(11):835–841. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources