Comparison of Appendectomy Outcomes Between Senior General Surgeons and General Surgery Residents
- PMID: 28423177
- PMCID: PMC5547924
- DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0578
Comparison of Appendectomy Outcomes Between Senior General Surgeons and General Surgery Residents
Abstract
Importance: In some centers, the presence of a senior general surgeon (SGS) is obligatory in every procedure, including appendectomy, while in others it is not. There is a relative paucity in the literature of reports comparing the outcomes of appendectomies performed by unsupervised general surgery residents (GSRs) with those performed in the presence of an SGS.
Objective: To compare the outcomes of appendectomies performed by SGSs with those performed by GSRs.
Design, setting, and participants: A retrospective analysis was performed of all patients 16 years or older operated on for assumed acute appendicitis between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2015. The cohort study compared appendectomies performed by SGSs and GSRs in the general surgical department of a teaching hospital.
Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome measured was the postoperative early and late complication rates. Secondary outcomes included time from emergency department to operating room, length of surgery, surgical technique (open or laparoscopic), use of laparoscopic staplers, and overall duration of postoperative antibiotic treatment.
Results: Among 1649 appendectomy procedures (mean [SD] patient age, 33.7 [13.3] years; 612 female [37.1%]), 1101 were performed by SGSs and 548 by GSRs. Analysis demonstrated no significant difference between the SGS group and the GSR group in overall postoperative early and late complication rates, the use of imaging techniques, time from emergency department to operating room, percentage of complicated appendicitis, postoperative length of hospital stay, and overall duration of postoperative antibiotic treatment. However, length of surgery was significantly shorter in the SGS group than in the GSR group (mean [SD], 39.9 [20.9] vs 48.6 [20.2] minutes; P < .001).
Conclusions and relevance: This study demonstrates that unsupervised surgical residents may safely perform appendectomies, with no difference in postoperative early and late complication rates compared with those performed in the presence of an SGS.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Comment in
-
Increasing Resident Autonomy Without Compromising Patient Safety.JAMA Surg. 2017 Jul 1;152(7):685. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0582. JAMA Surg. 2017. PMID: 28423148 No abstract available.
-
Association Between Appendectomy Outcomes and Surgeons' Seniority.JAMA Surg. 2018 Feb 1;153(2):188-189. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.4004. JAMA Surg. 2018. PMID: 29071334 No abstract available.
References
-
- Stewart B, Khanduri P, McCord C, et al. . Global disease burden of conditions requiring emergency surgery. Br J Surg. 2014;101(1):e9-e22. - PubMed
-
- Bhangu A, Søreide K, Di Saverio S, Assarsson JH, Drake FT. Acute appendicitis: modern understanding of pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management. Lancet. 2015;386(10000):1278-1287. - PubMed
-
- Wu JX, Dawes AJ, Sacks GD, Brunicardi FC, Keeler EB. Cost effectiveness of nonoperative management versus laparoscopic appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis. Surgery. 2015;158(3):712-721. - PubMed
-
- Richards MK, McAteer JP, Drake FT, Goldin AB, Khandelwal S, Gow KW. A national review of the frequency of minimally invasive surgery among general surgery residents: assessment of ACGME case logs during 2 decades of general surgery resident training. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(2):169-172. - PubMed
-
- Shabtai M, Rosin D, Zmora O, et al. . The impact of a resident’s seniority on operative time and length of hospital stay for laparoscopic appendectomy: outcomes used to measure the resident’s laparoscopic skills. Surg Endosc. 2004;18(9):1328-1330. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical