Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Mar 29:8:116.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2017.00116. eCollection 2017.

Emerging Approaches for Validating and Managing Multiple Sclerosis Relapse

Affiliations
Review

Emerging Approaches for Validating and Managing Multiple Sclerosis Relapse

Elizabeth A Mills et al. Front Neurol. .

Abstract

The autoimmune disease multiple sclerosis (MS) is characterized by relapses in the majority of patients. A definitive clinical diagnosis of relapse in MS can be complicated by the presence of an infection or comorbid disorder. In this mini-review, we describe efforts to develop enhanced imaging techniques and biomarker detection as future tools for relapse validation. There is emerging evidence of roles for meningeal inflammation, sex hormones, comorbid metabolic or mood disorders, and a dysregulated immune profile in the manifestation and severity of relapse. Specific subsets of immune cells likely drive the pathophysiology of relapse, and identification of a patient's unique immunological signature of relapse may help guide future diagnosis and treatment. Finally, these studies highlight the diversity in terms of relapse presentation, immunological signature, and response in patients with MS, indicating that going forward the best approach to assessment and treatment of relapse will be multifactorial and highly personalized.

Keywords: biomarker; comorbidity; cortical lesion; estrogen; pseudo-relapse.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Emerging methods to validate and monitor treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse. This schematic provides an outline of how currently available and emerging tools could be used to help validate the diagnosis of MS relapse, as determined through a physical exam. Assessment scales are currently the easiest, but subject to patient biases, and advanced imaging techniques the most reliable, but least accessible. Biomarkers are emerging as a new avenue to bridge this divide, but still require further clinical validation. Diagnosis can be confounded by comorbid disorders, the presence of which can also impact treatment decisions. If patients are diagnosed with a true relapse, the choice of treatment will depend on severity, and effectiveness can be monitored using the relapse validation tools.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Repovic P, Lublin FD. Treatment of multiple sclerosis exacerbations. Neurol Clin (2011) 29(2):389–400.10.1016/j.ncl.2010.12.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kalincik T, Buzzard K, Jokubaitis V, Trojano M, Duquette P, Izquierdo G, et al. Risk of relapse phenotype recurrence in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J (2014) 20(11):1511–22.10.1177/1352458514528762 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Davis SL, Wilson TE, White AT, Frohman EM. Thermoregulation in multiple sclerosis. J Appl Physiol (2010) 109(5):1531–7.10.1152/japplphysiol.00460.2010 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology (1983) 33(11):1444–52.10.1212/WNL.33.11.1444 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rudick RA, Cutter G, Reingold S. The multiple sclerosis functional composite: a new clinical outcome measure for multiple sclerosis trials. Mult Scler (2002) 8(5):359–65.10.1191/1352458502ms845oa - DOI - PubMed