Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr 20:7:46703.
doi: 10.1038/srep46703.

Modulation Doping of Silicon using Aluminium-induced Acceptor States in Silicon Dioxide

Affiliations

Modulation Doping of Silicon using Aluminium-induced Acceptor States in Silicon Dioxide

Dirk König et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

All electronic, optoelectronic or photovoltaic applications of silicon depend on controlling majority charge carriers via doping with impurity atoms. Nanoscale silicon is omnipresent in fundamental research (quantum dots, nanowires) but also approached in future technology nodes of the microelectronics industry. In general, silicon nanovolumes, irrespective of their intended purpose, suffer from effects that impede conventional doping due to fundamental physical principles such as out-diffusion, statistics of small numbers, quantum- or dielectric confinement. In analogy to the concept of modulation doping, originally invented for III-V semiconductors, we demonstrate a heterostructure modulation doping method for silicon. Our approach utilizes a specific acceptor state of aluminium atoms in silicon dioxide to generate holes as majority carriers in adjacent silicon. By relocating the dopants from silicon to silicon dioxide, Si nanoscale doping problems are circumvented. In addition, the concept of aluminium-induced acceptor states for passivating hole selective tunnelling contacts as required for high-efficiency photovoltaics is presented and corroborated by first carrier lifetime and tunnelling current measurements.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. DFT results on SiO2 modulation doping with Al acceptors.
(a,b) Si10 nanocrystal (cyan) in three ML SiO2 (O is red, Si grey, H white) with Al atom (yellow) replacing Si in outermost SiO2 shell, showing β-HOMO (a) and β-LUMO (b) as iso-density plots of 4 × 10−4e/cubic Bohr radius. (c) Electronic DOS (blue, red) of that approximant (energy scale refers to vacuum level Evac). DOS for pure SiO2 embedding (cyan, orange) is shown for comparison along with the HOMO and LUMO of a 1.9 nm Si nanocrystal fully terminated with OH groups. The two possible MO spin orientations are noted by α and β due to unpaired electron configuration caused by the acceptor (doublet). (d) Band structures showing the principle of direct modulation doping for a Si nanocrystal (NC) in SiO2 and (e) for Si bulk terminated with SiO2:Al layer. Occupation of electronic states are described by chemical potential μ and Fermi level EF, respectively.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Electronic characterization of SiO2 modulation doping with Al acceptors using Al/SiO2/Al-O/SiO2/Si MOS structures.
(a) Sample structure showing Al modulation acceptors charged from Si substrate by electron tunnelling. (b) CV curves of reference sample Al0 (no Al-O), Al1 (1 ML Al-O) and Al2 (2 ML Al-O) measured at T = 300 K; ΔVfb and ΔQfix due to negatively ionized Al shown by coloured arrows. (c) Band structure scheme of charge transient measurements for electron release [scheme I] and for electron capture [scheme II] by Al in DLTS. (d) Electron release of Al in SiO2 with pulse time tp = 205 μs, transient time TW = 31 ms and pulse voltage Vp = +0.5 V as function of reference voltage VR measured at T = 102 K to freeze out inelastic scattering and trap-assisted processes for maximum energy resolution by direct electron tunnelling into Si. (e) Electron capture with transient time TW = 3.63 s, pulse voltage Vp = −4 V and reference voltage VR = 0 V as function of pulse time tp measured at T = 502 K to activate all transport paths (hopping, direct and trap assisted tunnelling) for maximum occupation probability of Al in SiO2. Arrows show sub-peaks in accord with Al-O MLs. Capacitance per area scale changes from pF/cm2 in (d) to nF/cm2 in (e).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Effect of SiO2:Al modulation doping on effective minority carrier (hole) lifetime and hole tunnelling current density.
(a) Double-side polished 1.6 Ωcm phosphorus-doped 525 μm Cz-Si wafers with RTO/Al-O/SiO2 stacks on both sides (sample Al1) show more than 2 orders of magnitude higher lifetimes compared to the RTO/SiO2 reference sample (Al0). The effective minority carrier lifetime of Al1 at an excess minority carrier concentration corresponding to 1 sun illumination (Δp = 1015 cm−3) is τhole = 1 ms. (b) Hole tunnelling current density under accumulation bias on boron-doped Cz-Si wafers with RTO/Al-O/SiO2 stacks (3 nm total thickness). The Al-O monolayer in sample Al1 enables 1 order of magnitude higher hole current densities at small bias as compared to sample Al0 (RTO/SiO2 reference sample).
Figure 4
Figure 4. Application examples for Si modulation doping.
(a,c) Undoped Si fin-FETs can be provided with holes as majority carriers from Al acceptors in the buried oxide layer forming the base of the fin (a), eliminating any size limit due to conventional doping. The band diagram of such fin-FET (c) shows its working principle as hole depletion (p self-conducting) transistor. (b,d) HIT Si solar cells can be equipped with massively enhanced hole contacts where SiO2 is the optimum choice in terms of chemical bond interface passivation (b). Moreover, SiO2 provides a much increased minority (electron) barrier while accelerating holes through a low tunnelling barrier thanks to negatively charged acceptors located about 0.5 eV below the valence band of c-Si. The band diagram of such a hole contact shows its working principle to provide much increased conversion efficiencies of HIT solar cells (d).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Dalpian G. M. & Chelikowsky J. R. Self-Purification in Semiconductor Nanocrystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 226802 (2006). - PubMed
    1. Cantele G. et al.. First-principles study of n- and p-doped silicon nanoclusters. Phys. Rev. B. 72, 113303 (2005).
    1. König D. et al.. Location and Electronic Nature of Phosphorus in the Si Nanocrystal−SiO2 System. Sci. Rep. 5, 9702 (2015). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pierre M. et al.. Single-donor ionization energies in a nanoscale CMOS channel. Nature Nanotech. 5, 133–137 (2010). - PubMed
    1. Björk M. T., Schmid H., Knoch J., Riel H. & Riess W. Donor deactivation in silicon nanostructures. Nature Nanotech. 4, 103–107 (2009). - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources