United States Population-Based Estimates of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Symptom and Functional Status Reference Values for Individuals With Cancer
- PMID: 28426375
- PMCID: PMC5466008
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.4410
United States Population-Based Estimates of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Symptom and Functional Status Reference Values for Individuals With Cancer
Abstract
Purpose To estimate cancer population-based reference values in the United States for eight PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) domains by age and stage of disease. Patients and Methods For the Measuring Your Health (MY-Health) study, persons newly diagnosed with cancer (prostate, colorectal, non-small-cell lung, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, breast, uterine, or cervical) from 2010 to 2012 (N = 5,284) were recruited through the National Cancer Institute's SEER Program. Participants were mailed surveys 6 to 13 months after diagnosis. Raking by race/ethnicity, age, and stage generated weighted average PROMIS scores for pain interference, fatigue, anxiety, depression, sleep disturbance, physical function, ability to participate in social roles, and cognitive function. PROMIS measures are standardized to a T-score metric, with a score of 50 representing the general US population mean. Clinically meaningful differences were defined as a 3-point difference in scores. Results Several reference values (means) for patients with cancer were worse than the general United States population norms of 50. These include pain interference (52.4), fatigue (52.2), and physical function (44.1). Reference values were highest (ie, showed greatest symptom burden) in lung cancer (pain interference, 55.5; fatigue, 57.3; depression, 51.4) and cervical cancer (anxiety, 53.2; sleep disturbance, 53.4). Reference values for patients age 65 to 84 years reported lower sleep disturbance, anxiety, and depression, and better cognitive function than younger patients. Cancer reference values were poorer among those with advanced disease compared with patients with limited or no evidence of disease, specifically physical function (41.1 v 46.6, respectively), fatigue (55.8 v 50.2, respectively), and pain interference (55.2 v 50.9, respectively). Conclusion In a large, population-based sample of patients with recently diagnosed cancer, we observed symptom severity and functional deficits by age, stage, and cancer type consistent with the expected impact of cancer diagnosis and treatment. These United States cancer reference values can help facilitate interpretation of the PROMIS domain scores in research studies or in clinical applications that measure and evaluate the symptom and functional burden patients with cancer experience after initial treatment.
Conflict of interest statement
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) is an NIH Roadmap initiative to develop valid and reliable patient-reported outcome measures to be applicable across a wide range of chronic diseases and demographic characteristics. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Cancer Institute or the NIH.
Similar articles
-
People with multiple sclerosis report significantly worse symptoms and health related quality of life than the US general population as measured by PROMIS and NeuroQoL outcome measures.Disabil Health J. 2018 Jan;11(1):99-107. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2017.04.008. Epub 2017 Apr 21. Disabil Health J. 2018. PMID: 28442320
-
Fatigue, patient reported outcomes, and objective measurement of physical activity in systemic lupus erythematosus.Lupus. 2016 Oct;25(11):1190-9. doi: 10.1177/0961203316631632. Epub 2016 Feb 10. Lupus. 2016. PMID: 26869353 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of the PROMIS physical function measures in a diverse US population-based cohort of cancer patients.Qual Life Res. 2015 Oct;24(10):2333-44. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-0992-9. Epub 2015 May 3. Qual Life Res. 2015. PMID: 25935353 Free PMC article.
-
Standardizing patient-reported outcomes assessment in cancer clinical trials: a patient-reported outcomes measurement information system initiative.J Clin Oncol. 2007 Nov 10;25(32):5106-12. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.2341. J Clin Oncol. 2007. PMID: 17991929 Review.
-
Utility of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) to measure primary health outcomes in cancer patients: a systematic review.Support Care Cancer. 2021 Apr;29(4):1723-1739. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05801-6. Epub 2020 Oct 15. Support Care Cancer. 2021. PMID: 33058000
Cited by
-
Factors affecting symptom presentation in an early-phase clinical trials clinic patient population.Invest New Drugs. 2020 Aug;38(4):1166-1174. doi: 10.1007/s10637-019-00879-0. Epub 2019 Nov 25. Invest New Drugs. 2020. PMID: 31761957 Free PMC article.
-
Psychological predictors of delayed active treatment following active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: The Patient REported outcomes for Prostate cARE prospective cohort study.BJUI Compass. 2021 Dec 14;3(3):226-237. doi: 10.1002/bco2.124. eCollection 2022 May. BJUI Compass. 2021. PMID: 35492225 Free PMC article.
-
Patient-caregiver dyads in pancreatic cancer: identification of patient and caregiver factors associated with caregiver well-being.J Behav Med. 2022 Dec;45(6):935-946. doi: 10.1007/s10865-022-00354-x. Epub 2022 Aug 20. J Behav Med. 2022. PMID: 35986871
-
Toward Modernization of Geriatric Oncology by Digital Health Technologies.Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2020 Mar;40:1-7. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_279505. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2020. PMID: 32243198 Free PMC article.
-
[Prehabilitation prior to radical prostatectomy : A useful concept?].Urologie. 2023 Oct;62(10):1041-1047. doi: 10.1007/s00120-023-02173-7. Epub 2023 Aug 24. Urologie. 2023. PMID: 37620505 Review. German.
References
-
- Clauser SB, Ganz PA, Lipscomb J, et al. Patient-reported outcomes assessment in cancer trials: Evaluating and enhancing the payoff to decision making. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5049–5050. - PubMed
-
- Ganz PA, Gotay CC. Use of patient-reported outcomes in phase III cancer treatment trials: Lessons learned and future directions. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5063–5069. - PubMed
-
- Gondek K, Sagnier PP, Gilchrist K, et al. Current status of patient-reported outcomes in industry-sponsored oncology clinical trials and product labels. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:5087–5093. - PubMed
-
- Brucker PS, Yost K, Cashy J, et al. General population and cancer patient norms for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) Eval Health Prof. 2005;28:192–211. - PubMed
-
- Scott NW, Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, et al: EORTC QLQ-C30 reference values. http://groups.eortc.be/qol/sites/default/files/img/newsletter/reference_....
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical