Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Apr 20;12(4):e0176274.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176274. eCollection 2017.

Religion and the public ethics of stem-cell research: Attitudes in Europe, Canada and the United States

Affiliations

Religion and the public ethics of stem-cell research: Attitudes in Europe, Canada and the United States

Nick Allum et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

We examine international public opinion towards stem-cell research during the period when the issue was at its most contentious. We draw upon representative sample surveys in Europe and North America, fielded in 2005 and find that the majority of people in Europe, Canada and the United States supported stem-cell research, providing it was tightly regulated, but that there were key differences between the geographical regions in the relative importance of different types of ethical position. In the U.S., moral acceptability was more influential as a driver of support for stem-cell research; in Europe the perceived benefit to society carried more weight; and in Canada the two were almost equally important. We also find that public opinion on stem-cell research was more strongly associated with religious convictions in the U.S. than in Canada and Europe, although many strongly religious citizens in all regions approved of stem-cell research. We conclude that if anything public opinion or 'public ethics' are likely to play an increasingly important role in framing policy and regulatory regimes for sensitive technologies in the future.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

References

    1. Thompson C., Good science: the ethical choreography of stem cell research. 2013: MIT Press.
    1. Wadman M. and Abbott A., A long week in stem-cell politics. Nature, 2006. 442(7101): p. 335–335. doi: 10.1038/442335a - DOI - PubMed
    1. Reardon S., Global summit reveals divergent views on human gene editing, in Nature. 2015. p. 173. - PubMed
    1. Link H.-J., Playing God and the intrinsic value of life: moral problems for synthetic biology? Science and engineering ethics, 2013. 19(2): p. 435–448. doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9353-z - DOI - PubMed
    1. Einsiedel E., et al., Brave new sheep: the clone named Dolly, in Biotechnology: the making of a global controversy, Bauer M. and Gaskell G., Editors. 2002, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

LinkOut - more resources