Who Uses Mobile Phone Health Apps and Does Use Matter? A Secondary Data Analytics Approach
- PMID: 28428170
- PMCID: PMC5415654
- DOI: 10.2196/jmir.5604
Who Uses Mobile Phone Health Apps and Does Use Matter? A Secondary Data Analytics Approach
Abstract
Background: Mobile phone use and the adoption of healthy lifestyle software apps ("health apps") are rapidly proliferating. There is limited information on the users of health apps in terms of their social demographic and health characteristics, intentions to change, and actual health behaviors.
Objective: The objectives of our study were to (1) to describe the sociodemographic characteristics associated with health app use in a recent US nationally representative sample; (2) to assess the attitudinal and behavioral predictors of the use of health apps for health promotion; and (3) to examine the association between the use of health-related apps and meeting the recommended guidelines for fruit and vegetable intake and physical activity.
Methods: Data on users of mobile devices and health apps were analyzed from the National Cancer Institute's 2015 Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS), which was designed to provide nationally representative estimates for health information in the United States and is publicly available on the Internet. We used multivariable logistic regression models to assess sociodemographic predictors of mobile device and health app use and examine the associations between app use, intentions to change behavior, and actual behavioral change for fruit and vegetable consumption, physical activity, and weight loss.
Results: From the 3677 total HINTS respondents, older individuals (45-64 years, odds ratio, OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.47-68; 65+ years, OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.14-0.24), males (OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.66-0.94), and having degree (OR 2.83, 95% CI 2.18-3.70) or less than high school education (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.24-0.72) were all significantly associated with a reduced likelihood of having adopted health apps. Similarly, both age and education were significant variables for predicting whether a person had adopted a mobile device, especially if that person was a college graduate (OR 3.30). Individuals with apps were significantly more likely to report intentions to improve fruit (63.8% with apps vs 58.5% without apps, P=.01) and vegetable (74.9% vs 64.3%, P<.01) consumption, physical activity (83.0% vs 65.4%, P<.01), and weight loss (83.4% vs 71.8%, P<.01). Individuals with apps were also more likely to meet recommendations for physical activity compared with those without a device or health apps (56.2% with apps vs 47.8% without apps, P<.01).
Conclusions: The main users of health apps were individuals who were younger, had more education, reported excellent health, and had a higher income. Although differences persist for gender, age, and educational attainment, many individual sociodemographic factors are becoming less potent in influencing engagement with mobile devices and health app use. App use was associated with intentions to change diet and physical activity and meeting physical activity recommendations.
Keywords: Internet; cell phone; health behavior; health promotion; mobile applications; smartphone.
©Jennifer K Carroll, Anne Moorhead, Raymond Bond, William G LeBlanc, Robert J Petrella, Kevin Fiscella. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 19.04.2017.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Using Smartphones and Health Apps to Change and Manage Health Behaviors: A Population-Based Survey.J Med Internet Res. 2017 Apr 5;19(4):e101. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6838. J Med Internet Res. 2017. PMID: 28381394 Free PMC article.
-
Who are mobile app users from healthy lifestyle websites? Analysis of patterns of app use and user characteristics.Transl Behav Med. 2017 Dec;7(4):891-901. doi: 10.1007/s13142-017-0525-x. Transl Behav Med. 2017. PMID: 28929368 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of a Web-Based Guided Recommendation Service for a Curated List of Readily Available Mental Health and Well-Being Mobile Apps for Young People: Randomized Controlled Trial.J Med Internet Res. 2017 May 12;19(5):e141. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6775. J Med Internet Res. 2017. PMID: 28500020 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Can Mobile Phone Apps Influence People's Health Behavior Change? An Evidence Review.J Med Internet Res. 2016 Oct 31;18(11):e287. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5692. J Med Internet Res. 2016. PMID: 27806926 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Use of the Internet and mobile-based "apps" for sex-seeking among men who have sex with men in New York City.Am J Mens Health. 2014 Nov;8(6):510-20. doi: 10.1177/1557988314527311. Epub 2014 Mar 20. Am J Mens Health. 2014. PMID: 24658284 Review.
Cited by
-
The Functionality, Evidence, and Privacy Issues Around Smartphone Apps for the Top Neuropsychiatric Conditions.J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2021 Winter;33(1):72-79. doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.19120353. Epub 2020 Jul 16. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 32669020 Free PMC article.
-
Responsiveness, Reliability, and Minimally Important and Minimal Detectable Changes of 3 Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Low Back Pain: Validation Study.J Med Internet Res. 2018 Oct 24;20(10):e272. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9828. J Med Internet Res. 2018. PMID: 30355556 Free PMC article.
-
Use of Health Apps and Wearable Devices: Survey Among Italian Associations for Patient Advocacy.JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 15;7(1):e10242. doi: 10.2196/10242. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019. PMID: 30664455 Free PMC article.
-
Fitness Apps, Live Streaming Workout Classes, and Virtual Reality Fitness for Physical Activity During the COVID-19 Lockdown: An Empirical Study.Front Public Health. 2022 Jun 22;10:852311. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.852311. eCollection 2022. Front Public Health. 2022. PMID: 35812515 Free PMC article.
-
Effectiveness of Mobile Health Applications for 5% Body Weight Reduction in Obese and Overweight Adults.J Obes Metab Syndr. 2021 Dec 30;30(4):354-364. doi: 10.7570/jomes21014. J Obes Metab Syndr. 2021. PMID: 34853189 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Ericsson. 2015. [2016-01-22]. Ericsson Mobility Report: On the pulse of the networked society http://www.ericsson.com/res/docs/2015/ericsson-mobility-report-june-2015... .
-
- OfCom. 2015. [2016-01-22]. Smartphone usage http://media.ofcom.org.uk/facts/
-
- OfCom. Belfast: OfCom; 2014. [2017-02-27]. Telecommunications facts and figures https://www.ofcom.org.uk/
-
- Smith A. Pew Research Center. 2015. [2017-02-28]. The Smartphone Difference http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/04/01/us-smartphone-use-in-2015/
-
- Boudreaux ED, Waring ME, Hayes RB, Sadasivam RS, Mullen S, Pagoto S. Evaluating and selecting mobile health apps: strategies for healthcare providers and healthcare organizations. Transl Behav Med. 2014 Dec;4(4):363–71. doi: 10.1007/s13142-014-0293-9. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/25584085 293 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources