Regulatory Aspects of Optical Methods and Exogenous Targets for Cancer Detection
- PMID: 28428283
- PMCID: PMC5567809
- DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-3217
Regulatory Aspects of Optical Methods and Exogenous Targets for Cancer Detection
Erratum in
-
Correction: Regulatory Aspects of Optical Methods and Exogenous Targets for Cancer Detection.Cancer Res. 2018 Feb 15;78(4):1123. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-3847. Cancer Res. 2018. PMID: 29449320 No abstract available.
Abstract
Considerable advances in cancer-specific optical imaging have improved the precision of tumor resection. In comparison to traditional imaging modalities, this technology is unique in its ability to provide real-time feedback to the operating surgeon. Given the significant clinical implications of optical imaging, there is an urgent need to standardize surgical navigation tools and contrast agents to facilitate swift regulatory approval. Because fluorescence-enhanced surgery requires a combination of both device and drug, each may be developed in conjunction, or separately, which are important considerations in the approval process. This report is the result of a one-day meeting held on May 4, 2016 with officials from the National Cancer Institute, the FDA, members of the American Society of Image-Guided Surgery, and members of the World Molecular Imaging Society, which discussed consensus methods for FDA-directed human testing and approval of investigational optical imaging devices as well as contrast agents for surgical applications. The goal of this workshop was to discuss FDA approval requirements and the expectations for approval of these novel drugs and devices, packaged separately or in combination, within the context of optical surgical navigation. In addition, the workshop acted to provide clarity to the research community on data collection and trial design. Reported here are the specific discussion items and recommendations from this critical and timely meeting. Cancer Res; 77(9); 2197-206. ©2017 AACR.
©2017 American Association for Cancer Research.
Conflict of interest statement
J. Fengler is a vice president, Technology R&D at Novadaq Technologies Inc. J. Sorger is an employee at Intuitive Surgical. J.F. Frangioni has ownership interest (including patents) in Curadel. J.P. Basilion is a consultant, BOD at Akrotome Imaging, reports receiving a commercial research grant from Akrotome imaging, has ownership interest (including patents) in Akrotome Imaging, is a consultant/advisory board member for Akrotome Imaging, Vergent Bioscience. S.S. Gambhir has ownership interest (including patents) in Cellsight, RefleXion Medical, Inc., is a consultant/advisory board member for Bracco Diagnostics, Endra, Inc., Vor BioPharma, Grail, Inc., ImaginAb, Infinitus (China), MagArray, Inc., PureTech, RefleXion, Vave, and VisualSonics/Sonosite/Fuji. E.L. Rosenthal is a consultant/advisory board member for Surgvision and Aspyrion. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed by the other authors.
References
-
- American Cancer Society. Cancer facts and statistics. 2016 Available from: www.cancer.org.
-
- Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools (RePORT) National Institutes of Health; 2016. Available from: https://report.nih.gov/
-
- Daniltchenko DI, Riedl CR, Sachs MD, Koenig F, Daha KL, Pflueger H, et al. Long-term benefit of 5-aminolevulinic acid fluorescence assisted transurethral resection of superficial bladder cancer: 5-year results of a prospective randomized study. J Urol. 2005;174:2129–33. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
