Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017:2017:4321925.
doi: 10.1155/2017/4321925. Epub 2017 Mar 27.

Effect of Enamel Caries Lesion Baseline Severity on Fluoride Dose-Response

Affiliations

Effect of Enamel Caries Lesion Baseline Severity on Fluoride Dose-Response

Frank Lippert. Int J Dent. 2017.

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the effect of enamel caries lesion baseline severity on fluoride dose-response under pH cycling conditions. Early caries lesions were created in human enamel specimens at four different severities (8, 16, 24, and 36 h). Lesions were allocated to treatment groups (0, 83, and 367 ppm fluoride as sodium fluoride) based on Vickers surface microhardness (VHN) and pH cycled for 5 d. The cycling model comprised 3 × 1 min fluoride treatments sandwiched between 2 × 60 min demineralization challenges with specimens stored in artificial saliva in between. VHN was measured again and changes versus lesion baseline were calculated (ΔVHN). Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05). Increased demineralization times led to increased surface softening. The lesion severity×fluoride concentration interaction was significant (p < 0.001). Fluoride dose-response was observed in all groups. Lesions initially demineralized for 16 and 8 h showed similar overall rehardening (ΔVHN) and more than 24 and 36 h lesions, which were similar. The 8 h lesions showed the greatest fluoride response differential (367 versus 0 ppm F) which diminished with increasing lesion baseline severity. The extent of rehardening as a result of the 0 ppm F treatment increased with increasing lesion baseline severity, whereas it decreased for the fluoride treatments. In conclusion, lesion baseline severity impacts the extent of the fluoride dose-response.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Least square means for all post-pH cycling variables by lesion severity and fluoride concentration. Error bars were omitted for better clarity. Horizontal lines indicate fluoride concentration comparisons within each lesion severity which were not statistically significantly different. Different capital letters highlight statistically significant differences within the same fluoride concentration between lesion severities.

References

    1. Marinho V. C., Higgins J. P., Logan S., Sheiham A. Topical fluoride (toothpastes, mouthrinses, gels or varnishes) for preventing dental caries in children and adolescents. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2003;4CD002782 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bjarnason S., Finnbogason S. Y. Effect of different fluoride levels in dentifrice on the development of approximal caries. Caries Research. 1991;25(3):207–212. doi: 10.1159/000261369. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yamazaki H., Litman A., Margolis H. C. Effect of fluoride on artificial caries lesion progression and repair in human enamel: regulation of mineral deposition and dissolution under in vivo-like conditions. Archives of Oral Biology. 2007;52(2):110–120. doi: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2006.08.012. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lippert F., Butler A., Lynch R. J. M., Hara A. T. Effect of fluoride, lesion baseline severity and mineral distribution on lesion progression. Caries Research. 2012;46(1):23–30. doi: 10.1159/000334787. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Strang R., Damato F. A., Creanor S. L., Stephen K. W. The effect of baseline lesion mineral loss on in situ remineralization. Journal of Dental Research. 1987;66(11):1644–1646. doi: 10.1177/00220345870660110801. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources