Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep;66(9):1123-1130.
doi: 10.1007/s00262-017-2001-3. Epub 2017 Apr 20.

MuPeXI: prediction of neo-epitopes from tumor sequencing data

Affiliations

MuPeXI: prediction of neo-epitopes from tumor sequencing data

Anne-Mette Bjerregaard et al. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Personalization of immunotherapies such as cancer vaccines and adoptive T cell therapy depends on identification of patient-specific neo-epitopes that can be specifically targeted. MuPeXI, the mutant peptide extractor and informer, is a program to identify tumor-specific peptides and assess their potential to be neo-epitopes. The program input is a file with somatic mutation calls, a list of HLA types, and optionally a gene expression profile. The output is a table with all tumor-specific peptides derived from nucleotide substitutions, insertions, and deletions, along with comprehensive annotation, including HLA binding and similarity to normal peptides. The peptides are sorted according to a priority score which is intended to roughly predict immunogenicity. We applied MuPeXI to three tumors for which predicted MHC-binding peptides had been screened for T cell reactivity, and found that MuPeXI was able to prioritize immunogenic peptides with an area under the curve of 0.63. Compared to other available tools, MuPeXI provides more information and is easier to use. MuPeXI is available as stand-alone software and as a web server at http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services/MuPeXI .

Keywords: Immunotherapy; Mutation; Neo-antigens; Neo-epitopes; Prediction; Sequencing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
MuPeXI flow chart. Pre-processing: Raw sequencing data (WXS/WGS and RNA-seq) is analyzed, leading to variant calls (VCF file) and expression values. HLA alleles are determined, either from the NGS data or by other methods. a Effect: The first step of the MuPeXI algorithm is to determine the effect of the mutation on protein sequence using Ensembls Variant Effect Predictor (VEP). b Extraction: Peptides are extracted from mutated and normal proteome sequences and chopped up to the user-defined length. For in-frame mutations, amino acid changes are applied directly to the proteome reference. For frameshift mutations, nucleotide changes are applied to the cDNA reference and translated. c Similarity: To search for self-similarity, the entire proteome reference is chopped up (unless provided) into the user-defined lengths and searched for identical matches with the mutated peptides, which are penalized in the final peptide ranking. This peptide panel is also used to find the most similar normal peptide for peptides originating from indels and frameshifts. d MHC binding: Peptide binding affinities are determined by NetMHCpan 3.0 for both mutated and normal peptides. e Expression: if an expression file is provided the relevant expression value is given for the corresponding gene or the sum of the transcripts which contain the peptide. f Annotations: All relevant information for each mutated, normal peptide pair are annotated. g Ranking: Finally, the peptides are ranked according to the priority score
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
MuPeXI and pVac-Seq performance comparison. The MuPeXI performance is plotted as a ROC curve based on the priority score. pVac-Seq performance is plotted as individual calculations of sensitivity and specificity according to various filtering combinations. The red triangle indicates pVac-Seq performance using default filtering criteria

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Vormehr M, Diken M, Boegel S, et al. Mutanome directed cancer immunotherapy. Curr Opin Immunol. 2015;39:14–22. doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2015.12.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schumacher TN, Schreiber RD. Neoantigens in cancer immunotherapy. Science. 2015;348:69–74. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa4971. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rizvi NA, Hellmann MD, Snyder A, et al. Cancer immunology. Mutational landscape determines sensitivity to PD-1 blockade in non-small cell lung cancer. Science. 2015;348:124–128. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa1348. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McGranahan N, Furness AJS, Rosenthal R, et al. Clonal neoantigens elicit T cell immunoreactivity and sensitivity to immune checkpoint blockade. Science. 2016;351:1463–1469. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf1490. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Snyder A, Makarov V, Merghoub T, et al. Genetic basis for clinical response to CTLA-4 blockade in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;371:2189–2199. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406498. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances