Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Apr;5(2):10.1128/microbiolspec.tnmi7-0045-2017.
doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.TNMI7-0045-2017.

Mycobacterium avium Complex Disease

Affiliations
Review

Mycobacterium avium Complex Disease

Charles L Daley. Microbiol Spectr. 2017 Apr.

Abstract

Despite the ubiqitous nature of Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) organisms in the environment, relatively few of those who are infected develop disease. Thus, some degree of susceptibility due to either underlying lung disease or immunosuppression is required. The frequency of pulmonary MAC disease is increasing in many areas, and the exact reasons are unknown. Isolation of MAC from a respiratory specimen does not necessarily mean that treatment is required, as the decision to treatment requires the synthesis of clinical, radiographic, and microbiologic information as well as a weighing of the risks and benefits for the individual patient. Successful treatment requires a multipronged approach that includes antibiotics, aggressive pulmonary hygiene, and sometimes resection of the diseased lung. A combination of azithromycin, rifampin, and ethambutol administered three times weekly is recommend for nodular bronchiectatic disease, whereas the same regimen may be used for cavitary disease but administered daily and often with inclusion of a parenteral aminoglycoside. Disseminated MAC (DMAC) is almost exclusively seen in patients with late-stage AIDS and can be treated with a macrolide in combination with ethambutol, with or without rifabutin: the most important intervention in this setting is to gain HIV control with the use of potent antiretroviral therapy. Treatment outcomes for many patients with MAC disease remain suboptimal, so new drugs and treatment regimens are greatly needed. Given the high rate of reinfection after cure, one of the greatest needs is a better understanding of where infection occurs and how this can be prevented.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Prevalence of pulmonary NTM cases among a sample of U.S. Medicare part B enrollees aged 65 and older, 1997 to 2007. From reference , with permission.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Interplay between environmental exposure, host susceptibility, and pathogen virulence.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Chest CT scan with coronal (A) and transverse (B) images from a patient with fibrocavitary pulmonary MAC. Bilateral upper lobe cavitation is noted, with associated volume loss in the setting of severe emphysema.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Chest CT scan from a patient with nodular bronchiectatic MAC, demonstrating multiple pulmonary nodules throughout both lungs, including tree-in-bud nodularity in the dependent sections below the right middle lobe and lingula.
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Treatment algorithm for MAC disease. If the isolate is macrolide susceptible and no cavities are present on chest imaging, a three-times-a-week 3-drug regimen is recommended. If cavitary changes are present, daily administration is recommended along with addition of parenteral amikacin (or streptomycin) and consideration of lung resection for focal disease. For macrolide-resistant disease, parenteral amikacin and lung resection should be strongly considered. IV, intravenous.

References

    1. Wallace RJ, Jr, Iakhiaeva E, Williams MD, Brown-Elliott BA, Vasireddy S, Vasireddy R, Lande L, Peterson DD, Sawicki J, Kwait R, Tichenor WS, Turenne C, Falkinham JO, III. 2013. Absence of Mycobacterium intracellulare and presence of Mycobacterium chimaera in household water and biofilm samples of patients in the United States with Mycobacterium avium complex respiratory disease. J Clin Microbiol 51:1747–1752. [PubMed] - PMC - PubMed
    1. Koh WJ, Jeong BH, Jeon K, Lee NY, Lee KS, Woo SY, Shin SJ, Kwon OJ. 2012. Clinical significance of the differentiation between Mycobacterium avium and Mycobacterium intracellulare in M. avium complex lung disease. Chest 142:1482–1488. [PubMed] - PubMed
    1. Boyle DP, Zembower TR, Reddy S, Qi C. 2015. Comparison of clinical features, virulence, and relapse among Mycobacterium avium complex species. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 191:1310–1317. [PubMed] - PubMed
    1. Boyle DP, Zembower TR, Qi C. 2016. Relapse versus reinfection of Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease. Patient characteristics and macrolide susceptibility. Ann Am Thorac Soc 13:1956–1961. [PubMed] - PubMed
    1. Katila ML, Iivanainen E, Torkko P, Kauppinen J, Martikainen P, Väänänen P. 1995. Isolation of potentially pathogenic mycobacteria in the Finnish environment. Scand J Infect Dis Suppl 98:9–11. [PubMed] - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources