Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May 1;32(3):375-380.
doi: 10.1093/arclin/acx005.

Effects of Delay Duration on the WMS Logical Memory Performance of Older Adults with Probable Alzheimer's Disease, Probable Vascular Dementia, and Normal Cognition

Valencia Montgomery  1 , Katie Harris  1 , Anthony Stabler  1 , Lisa H Lu  1
Affiliations

Effects of Delay Duration on the WMS Logical Memory Performance of Older Adults with Probable Alzheimer's Disease, Probable Vascular Dementia, and Normal Cognition

Valencia Montgomery et al. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. .

Abstract

Objective: To examine how the duration of time delay between Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS) Logical Memory I and Logical Memory II (LM) affected participants' recall performance.

Method: There are 46,146 total Logical Memory administrations to participants diagnosed with either Alzheimer's disease (AD), vascular dementia (VaD), or normal cognition in the National Alzheimer's Disease Coordinating Center's Uniform Data Set.

Results: Only 50% of the sample was administered the standard 20-35 min of delay as specified by WMS-R and WMS-III. We found a significant effect of delay time duration on proportion of information retained for the VaD group compared to its control group, which remained after adding LMI raw score as a covariate. There was poorer retention of information with longer delay for this group. This association was not as strong for the AD and cognitively normal groups. A 24.5-min delay was most optimal for differentiating AD from VaD participants (47.7% classification accuracy), an 18.5-min delay was most optimal for differentiating AD versus normal participants (51.7% classification accuracy), and a 22.5-min delay was most optimal for differentiating VaD versus normal participants (52.9% classification accuracy).

Conclusions: Considering diagnostic implications, our findings suggest that test administration should incorporate precise tracking of delay periods. We recommend a 20-min delay with 18-25-min range. Poor classification accuracy based on LM data alone is a reminder that story memory performance is only one piece of data that contributes to complex clinical decisions. However, strict adherence to the recommended range yields optimal data for diagnostic decisions.

Keywords: Non-standard test administration; Sensitivity; Specificity; Training.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Graphical display of differences between AD, VaD, and control participants in effect of delay time duration on proportion of LMI information retained during LMII.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Baddeley A., & Lewis V. (1984). When does rapid presentation enhance digit span. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 22, 403–405. doi:10.3758/BF03333858. - DOI
    1. Berry D. T., & Carpenter G. S. (1992). Effect of four different delay periods on recall of the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure by older persons. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 6, 80–84. doi:10.1080/13854049208404119. - DOI
    1. Cullum C. M., & Liff C. D. (2014). Mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer disease In Stucky K. J., Kirkwood M. W., & Donders J. (Eds.). Neuropsychology study guide & board review (pp. 448–465). New York: Oxford University Press.
    1. Desmond D. W. (2004). The neuropsychology of vascular cognitive impairment: Is there a specific cognitive deficit. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 226, 3–7. - PubMed
    1. Dillon R. F. (1981). Analogical reasoning under different methods of test administration. Applied Psychological Measurement, 5, 341–347. doi:10.1177/014662168100500307. - DOI